West Bengal

StateCommission

RP/138/2023

ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED - Complainant(s)

Versus

AMIT KHADOLIA - Opp.Party(s)

DIGANTA DAS

29 Nov 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
Revision Petition No. RP/138/2023
( Date of Filing : 17 Oct 2023 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/225/2016 of District North 24 Parganas)
 
1. ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
ONE INDIABULLS, CENTRE TOWER 1, 16TH FLOOR, 841, SENAPATI BAPAT MARG, ELPHINSTONE ROAD,
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
2. M/S ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
BANGUR BFL ESTATE, 1ST FLOOR, 31 CHOWRINGHEE ROAD
KOLKATA
WEST BENGAL
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. AMIT KHADOLIA
127, BT ROAD, SAKET NAGAR, 1A YAMUNA
KOLKATA
WEST BENGAL
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. AJEYA MATILAL PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. NITYASUNDAR TRIVEDI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:DIGANTA DAS, Advocate for the Petitioner 1
 
Dated : 29 Nov 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Hon’ble Mr. Ajeya Matilal, Presiding Member

Order No.04

Ld. Counsel for the Revisionist/Petitioner is present.

Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the Order vide Order No.34 dated 27.07.2023 passed by Hon’ble DCDRC, North 24 Parganas, Barasat in connection with the complaint case No.CC/225/2016 passing an order to the effect that the case shall run ex-parte against Opposite Party Nos.1,2 & 3, the Revisionist/Petitioner preferred this Revision Petition.

Heard the submission of the Ld. Counsel concerned.

Considered.

He drew our attention to an Order passed by the Commission on 06.03.2020 in FA being No.A/358/2018.  In the aforesaid Order this Commission observed “accordingly we remand the case to the Commission below for re-adjudication of the dispute on the basis of handwriting expart.   Incidental charges for the same have to be borne by the Appellant”.

The Appeal, thus, stands allowed in part.  

Parties to appear before the Ld. District Commission on 06.04.2020.

Ld. Counsel for Revisionist/Petitioner submitted that if the Order is not set aside he will not get any chance for referring the documents in question to the handwriting ex-part observing formalities.

So, we are of the view considering the illegal position of law. the impugned Order be deserves to be set aside.

Hence,

O R D E R E D

 

Revision Petition being No.138/2023 is allowed ex-parte without cost.

The impugned Order is set aside.

Parties are directed to appear before the Commission below on 16.12.2024.

Hon’ble Commision below is requested to dispose of the complaint case No. CC/225/2016 in accordance with law, after giving the concerned Parties an opportunity of being heard as early as possible.  Hon’ble Commission below may see why and how number of Opposite Parties increased from 2 to 6/7 or more.

Order of stay in connection with the present Revision Petition if any, is vacated.

Let a copy of this Order be sent down to the Commission below.

Thus, the Revision Petition being No.138/2023 stands disposed of.

Note accordingly.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. AJEYA MATILAL]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NITYASUNDAR TRIVEDI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.