Karnataka

StateCommission

A/4162/2011

M/s. Videocon Industries Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Amit Dhanuka - Opp.Party(s)

S.J. Sanghvi

21 Apr 2022

ORDER

KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.
 
First Appeal No. A/601/2012
( Date of Filing : 05 Apr 2012 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/11/2011 in Case No. CC/1115/2011 of District Bangalore 4th Additional)
 
1. Sri. Amit Dhanuka
Dhanuka Amit & Co., Chartered Accountant, 90/91 Weavers Colony, Sarakki Gate, 14th A Cross, Kanakapura Road, Bangalore 78 .
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Managing Director, Videocon Industries L
14th Km Stone, Aurangabad, Paiathan Road, Chiteagoan Tq., Paithan, Dist. Aurangabad - YESBEE .
2. The Manager, YESBEE
Electronics, 969/35-24, 11th Main Jayanagar, 5th Block, Banalore 11 and alos at No. 62, 3rd Floor, 1st Main, 3rd Cross, 2nd Stage, Yeshwanthpura Industrial Area, Yeshwanthpur, Bangalore 22 .
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/4162/2011
( Date of Filing : 20 Dec 2011 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/11/2011 in Case No. CC/1115/2011 of District Bangalore 4th Additional)
 
1. M/s. Videocon Industries Ltd.
A Public Limited company duly incorporated under the Companies Act 1956, having its Registered Office at 14 KM Stone, Village Chittegaon, Tq. Paithan, Dist. Aurangabad 431105 Rep. by its General Power of Attorney Holder Keshav Narayan Hegde, S/o. Narayan Hegde, Aged about 44 years .
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Amit Dhanuka
Dhanuka Amit & Co., Chartered Accountant, No. 90/91, Weavers Colony, Sarakki Gate, 14th A Cross, Kanakpura Road, Bangalore 560078 .
2. The Manager, YESBEE Electronics
No. 696/35-24, 11th Main, Jayanagar 5th Block, Bangalore 560011 .
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Ravishankar PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 21 Apr 2022
Final Order / Judgement

21.04.2022

ORDER

By Sri Ravishankar, Judicial Member

Case called twice – Appellant not present – No representation – So far arguments not submitted before this Commission inspite of sufficient opportunity provided to him.  Mere filing of an appeal is not sufficient to hold the appeal in the absence of any arguments and convincement by the appellant.  We consider that the appellant is not interested in continuing the case, as such, the appeal is dismissed.

 

                                                 Sd/-                                                                       Sd/-

                                            (Sunita .C. Bagewadi)                                               (Ravishankar)       

                                                        Member                                                         Judicial Member

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ravishankar]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.