Haryana

Ambala

CC/344/2019

Vinod Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Amazon - Opp.Party(s)

In Person

21 Jul 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.

 

                                                                      Complaint case no. :    344 of 2019.

                                                          Date of Institution           :    04.11.2019.

                                                          Date of decision     :    21.07.2022.

 

Vinod Kumar son of Shri Karam Singh, aged about 25 years, Resident of Village Dehar, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala at present # 3441, Manmohan Nagar, Ambala City.

 

          ……. Complainant.

                                                Versus

 

1.  Amazon.in, Amazon Seller Services Private Limited Customer Returns Dock, Kh No.18//21, 19//25, 34//5, 6, 7/1 min, 14/2/2/2 min 15/1 min, 9/1, 9/2, 10/1, 10/2, 11 min 12, 13, 14, village Jamalpur, Gurgaon, Haryana-122503, through its authorized signatory.

2.  Appario Retail Private Limited, 1st Floor, UB Plaza, St Marks Road, Shantala Nagar, Bangalore-560001, Karnataka, India.

 

                                                                                  ….….Opposite Parties.       

Before:        Ms. Neena Sandhu, President.

                   Ms. Ruby Sharma, Member,

Sh. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member.          

                            

Present:       None for the complainant.

                   Shri Rajeev Sachdeva, Advocate, counsel for the OP No.1.

 

          Complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

 

Order by:-  Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

 

          Today, the case was fixed for filing correct address of OP No.2, but none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. From the perusal of zimni orders, it is revealed that even from the last three dates of hearing i.e. 07.06.2022, 27.06.2022 and 11.07.2022, none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. Case called several times since morning, but none has appeared on behalf of complainant. It is already 04:00 P.M. Further wait is not justified. It appears that the complainant is not interested to pursue the present complaint. Accordingly, the present complaint is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Certified copy of the order be sent to the parties concerned free of costs as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room.

Pronounced:-21.07.2022.

 

 

 

Member                                    Member                                                                           President

                                                                                DCDRC, Ambala

                                                                               

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.