Kerala

Kozhikode

CC/196/2022

DEVADASAN V - Complainant(s)

Versus

AMAZON RETAIL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED - Opp.Party(s)

30 Jun 2023

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KARANTHUR PO,KOZHIKODE
 
Complaint Case No. CC/196/2022
( Date of Filing : 10 Aug 2022 )
 
1. DEVADASAN V
VELICHENNAPARAMBATH HOUSE PO GA COLLEGE NEAR MALABAR BOTANICAL GARDEN CALICUT KERALA
KOZHIKODE
KERALA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. AMAZON RETAIL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
BRIGADE GATEWAY 8TH FLOOR 26 1 DR RAJKUMAR ROAD MALLESHWARAM W BANGALORE-560055 KARNATAKA, INDIA
BENGALURU URBAN
KARNATAKA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE Member
 HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 30 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOZHIKODE

PRESENT : Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN, M.Com, LLB : PRESIDENT

Smt. PRIYA.S, BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) :  MEMBER

Sri.V. BALAKRISHNAN, M Tech, MBA, LL.B, FIE: MEMBER

Friday the 30th day of June 2023

C.C.196/2022

 

Complainant

 

V.Devadasan

Velichennaparambath House,

G.A.College – P.O,

Near Malabar Botanical Garden,

Kozhikode – 673 014.

 

Opposite Party

 

          Amazon Retail India Pvt. Ltd.

          Brigade Gateway, 8th Floor,

          26/1, Dr.Rajkumar Road,

          Malleswaram (W),

          Bangalore,

          Karnataka – 560 055.

 

ORDER

By Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN – PRESIDENT 

           This is a complaint filed under section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

  1. The complaint is filed for getting refund of Rs.6,990/- paid to the opposite party being the price of LG earbuds.
  2. The opposite party was set ex-parte.
  3. The points that arise for determination in this case are :
  1. Whether  there was any unfair trade practice or deficiency of service on the part of the opposite party, as alleged ?
  2. Reliefs and costs.

 

  1. Point No.1 –  The opposite party was set as ex-parte. The case was  posted for  evidence of the complainant  several times . But the complainant also remained absent in spite of giving intimation and did not file affidavit or adduce any evidence.  The fact that the opposite party was set ex-parte does not automatically entitles the complainant to get the relief sought for. It is for the  complainant to prove the allegations in the complaint by adducing proper evidence. But the complainant  in this case has utterly failed to prove his case. No unfair trade practice or deficiency of service as alleged is proved against the opposite party.

 

  1. Point No.2 :  In view of the finding on the above point, the complainant is not entitled to get the relief sought for and the complaint is only  to be dismissed. 

 

In the result, CC 196/2022 is dismissed. No order as to costs.

 

Pronounced in open Commission on this the 30th day of June, 2023.

 

Date of Filing: 10/08/2022

 

                     Sd/-                                                         Sd/-                                                               Sd/-

             PRESIDENT                                            MEMBER                                                    MEMBER

 

 

APPENDIX

NIL

 

                     Sd/-                                                        Sd/-                                                                Sd/-

             PRESIDENT                                            MEMBER                                                    MEMBER

 

                                                                                                                 True Copy,

                                                                  

                                                                     Sd/-

                                                         Assistant Registrar.                           

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE]
Member
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM)]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.