STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BIHAR, PATNA
(Appeal No.339 of 2015)
National Insurance
Company, Kolkata & Patna. Appellant.
VERSUS
Amar Kumar,
S/O- Shri Moti Lal Singh,
R/O- Vill- Bhangabha,
P.O.- Bariyarpur,
P.S.- Sakara,
District- Muzaffarpur & another.
Respondents.
BEFORE,
Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.K.Sinha, President,
Hon’ble Sri Upendra Jha, ADM(Rtd), Member and
Hon’ble Smt. Renu Sinha, member (F)
ORDER
02.02.2017
Upendra Jha Member.
This appeal is against the order dated 08.04.2015 passed by the District Forum, Muzaffarpur in complaint case no. 42 of 2009 by which the appellant are directed to pay Rs. 1,00,000/- with 9% interest and Rs. 10,000/- by way of litigation cost within 30 days failing which 9% interest will be payable.
2. Shortly, the case is that the complainant had obtained an Insurance Policy through respondent G.T.F.S for Rs. 1,00,000/- from the appellant O.P. During the insurance period life assured injured on 24.05.2005 due to an accident in toy factory in Delhi. F.I.R was lodged in local police . The Insurance company and G.T.F.S. were informed claimed was find but the claim was not settled. It was repudiated vide letter dated 17.02.2009. Then, this complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum. The appellant Insurance company could not contest the case there. After hearing parties the District Forum passed the impugned order against which this appeal is preferred.
3. Despite notices, one could appear on behalf of the respondent - complainant. The appellant has filed written notes of arguments. Heard.
4. The District Forum holding deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party – appellant for non- payment of Insurance amount has allowed the claim and passed the impugned order.
5. The counsel for the appellant submits that the under benefit of insured. Column 2.8 specifically mentioned that 50% compensation of insured amount is payable on physical separation of one entire hand but the District Forum has allowed 100% compensation beyond the terms and condition of the policy. Only 4 fingers of left hand was separated. It cannot be considered as amputation of entire hand. Hence, the District Forum order is not sustainable. It is fit to be set aside . The appeal be allowed.
6. Having considered the submission of opposite party Insurance company and on perusal of the order passed by the District Forum it appears that the District Forum has not considered the terms and conditions printed on the back side of the policy Bond. Under column 2.8 of Head benefit, actual loss by physical separation of one entire hand 50% sum insured is payable. But the District Forum has allowed 100% of the sum assured. It is not sustainable. However, non-payment of payable of admissible amount to the complainant is deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party - appellant and the complainant respondent is entitled to set this benefits. Hence, we allowed Rs. 50,000/- as sum assured against Rs. 1,00,000/- (One lacs only) awarded by the District Forum with 7% interest from the date of filing complaint. Compensation and litigation cost together Rs. 10,000/-. The appellant is directed to pay the above amount within 60 days from the date of receipt of this order failing which 10% P.A. interest will be payable.
The District Forum order is modified and the appeal is partly allowed. Let a copy of this order be sent to parties free of cost.
S.K. Sinha Renu Sinha Upendra Jha
President Member(F) Member(M)
Mukund