Chandigarh

StateCommission

FA/472/2010

Northern Railway Moradabad Division - Complainant(s)

Versus

Alok Kumar - Opp.Party(s)

Ms. Veena B. Sethi, Adv. for the appellant

18 Jul 2011

ORDER


The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019
FIRST APPEAL NO. 472 of 2010
1. Northern Railway Moradabad DivisionMoradabad through Senior Divisional Commercial Manager ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Alok Kumarson of Late Sh. K.B. Saxena, resident of H.No. 97/4, 'N' Area Air Post Road, Chandigarh2. Poonam Saxenaw/o Sh. Alok Kumar Resident of H.No. 97/4, 'N' Area Air Post Road, Chandigarh3. Union of IndiaMinistry of Railway through its Secretary,New Delhi4. Headquarter Northern RailwayNew Delhi through its Chief Commercial Manager5. Northern Railway Grievance Cellthrough Railway board, New Delhi6. Station SuperintendentNorthern Railway, Chandigarh7. Shri Adid Ali KhanDy. CIT posted at Barielly, Junction U.P.8. Officer-in-chargeGRP Post, Barielly Junction U.P ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Ms. Veena B. Sethi, Adv. for the appellant, Advocate for
For the Respondent :Sh.Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv. for respondents no. 1 & 2, None for proforma respondent no. 3 to 8, Advocate

Dated : 18 Jul 2011
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

U.T., CHANDIGARH

 

First Appeal No.472 of 2010

                                                                  

Date of Institution

:

31.12.2010

Date of Decision

:

18.07.2011

 

Northern Railway, Moradabad Division, Moradabad through Senior Divisional Commercial Manager.

… Appellant.

V E R S U S

1.            Alok Kumar son of Late Shri K.B. Saxena r/o H.No.97/4, ‘N’ Area, Air Post Road, Chandigarh.

2.            Poonam Saxena wife of Shri Alok Kumar r/o H.No.97/4, ‘N’ Area, Air Post Road, Chandigarh.

                                                                   … Respondents

3.            Union of India, Ministry of Railway through its Secretary, New Delhi.

4.            Headquarter Northern Railway, New Delhi through its Chief Commercial Manager.

5.            Northern Railway Grievance Cell, through Railway Board, New Delhi.

6.            Station Superintendent, Northern Railway, Chandigarh.

7.            Shri Adil Ali Khan, Dy. C.I.T. posted at Bareilly Junction, U.P.

8.            Officer-in-Charge, GRP Post, Bareilly Junction, U.P.

              .... Proforma Respondents

 

BEFORE:  HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER, PRESIDENT.

                MRS. NEENA SANDHU, MEMBER.

S.  JAGROOP  SINGH   MAHAL, MEMBER.

               

 

Argued by:          Ms. Veena B. Sethi, Adv. for the appellant

                   Sh. Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv. for respondents No.1 & 2

                   None for proforma respondents No.3 to 8

PER  JAGROOP  SINGH   MAHAL, MEMBER

                    For orders, see the orders passed in First Appeal No.453 of 2010 titled ‘Alok Kumar & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors.’, vide which this appeal has also been dismissed.

                    Copies of this order be sent to the parties free of charge.

Pronounced.

18th July, 2011

 

[JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER]

PRESIDENT

 

 

[NEENA SANDHU]

MEMBER

 

 

[JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL]

MEMBER

hg


HON'BLE MRS. NEENA SANDHU, MEMBERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER, PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, MEMBER