Haryana

Karnal

CC/447/2021

Sh. Rishi Singla - Complainant(s)

Versus

ALM Infotech City Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Hanumant Singh

08 Sep 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

 

                                                                     Complaint No.447 of 2021

                                                                     Date of instt. 06.09.2021

                                                                     Date of Decision: 08.09.2021

 

 

1.       Rishi Singla son of Shri Sunil Kumar Singla, resident of H.No.368-P, Sector-7, Urban Estate, Karnal, presently residing at Australia through his Special Power of Attorney Shri Sunil Singla son of Shri S.B.Singla, resident of H.No.368-P, Sector-7, Urban Estate, Karnal.

2.       Sunil Singla son of Shri S.B.Singla, resident of H.No.368-P, Sector-8, Urban Estate, Karnal.

                                                                             …….Complainants

                                                 Versus

 

ALM Infotech City Pvt. Ltd. Corporate Office: ILD, Trade Center, Sector-47, Sohana Road, Gurugram. Regd. Office B-418, New Friends Colony, New Delhi. Site Office: ALM Infotech City Pvt. Ltd (ILD Grand), Sector-37-C, Gurugram.

 

                                                                             …..Opposite party.

 

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

 

Before        Sh. Jaswant Singh………President.        

                   Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member

 

Present:     Shri Hanumant Singh, counsel for complainant.

 

         

                    Complaint presented today. It be checked and registered. Learned counsel for complainant suffered his separate statement to the effect that he does not want to pursue with the present complaint and withdraws the same on technical defect and sought permission to file afresh on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction.

                In view of statement of learned counsel for complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated: 08.09.2021

    President,         

District Consumer Disputes    

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

(Vineet Kaushik)     

     Member