Andhra Pradesh

East Godavari

CC/12/2013

Komarina Srihari - Complainant(s)

Versus

Allied Movers and Packers (P) Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Bh.V.Rama Sarma

30 Jun 2015

ORDER

District Consumer Forum - I
East Godavari., Kakinada
 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/2013
 
1. Komarina Srihari
S/o Venkataraju, Asst.General Manager, Andhrabank, Zonal Office, Kakinada.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Allied Movers and Packers (P) Ltd.
Plot.No. 18, First floor, 18th cross 7th Sec, H.S.R.LOYOUT, Rajiv Gandhi nagar, Bommanahalli,Bangalore - 68.
2. Allied Movers and Packers (P) Ltd
Plot No.18, First floor, 18th Cross,7th sec.H.S.R.LOYOUT Rajiv Gandhinagar, Bommanahalli, bangalore-68.
3. Allied Movers and Packers (P) Ltd.
Plot no.332, behind Telco service station, Rangapuri, Mahipalpur, New Delhi - 37.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.V.V.L.NARASIMHA RAO PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. S.BHASKAR RAO MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

O  R  D  E  R

(By Sri V.V.L. Narasimha Rao, President[FAC] on behalf of the Bench)

1.  The present complaint is filed by the complainant U/Sec. 12 of C.P. Act on 08.06.2012 and requested the Forum to direct the opposite parties 1 & 2 [1] to pay the expenditure for repairing Television set Rs. 7,000/- [2] to pay the expenditure for repairing the part of Refrigerator Rs. 4,500/- [3] to pay Rs. 3,500/- towards loss of kitchen articles [4] to award compensation of Rs. 10,000/- for causing mental agony and inconvenience to himself and his family members [5] to award costs for legal expenditure.

2.  The brief averments are as follows:  The complainant is working in Andhra Bank and resident of Bangalore.  In the month of December, 2011 he has been transferred from Bangalore to Kakinada, A.P. State.  To transport his house hold articles having heard about the opposite party business, he approached the opposite parties for transporting his house hold articles.  The complainant has paid an amount of Rs. 20,000/- to the 1st opposite party and the employees of 1st opposite party and given consignment note dated 24.12.2011 vide invoice / bill No. 2252 to the complainant.  There is a secured policy bearing No. 107 in the said invoice / bill for transportation of the consignment undertaken by the opposite parties. 

3.  The opposite parties employees have applied consignment articles from Bangalore to Kakinada where in a local guardian of Kakinada [Babu Packers and Movers] has been kept with the consignment while transporting the articles.  At the time of delivering the articles came to know that some 3rd party consignment has been kept in the consignment while transporting the complainant’s house hold articles.  The Sony Television make 26 inches which was in packed condition, after removing from the package it was not working.  While so, along with the television, refrigerator, glass and other cups and successors were in broken state.  In wooden part also broken.  The 1st opposite party people has delivered the articles delivered in bad state even after receiving amount of Rs. 25,000/- from the complainant.

4.   The complainant got the television repaired the local repairer it was estimated Rs. 7000/- and odd.  Besides television repair & cot were also repaired.  The repairs of refrigerator and cot is Rs. 4,500/-.  The estimation of house hold articles is valued about Rs. 3,500/-. Hence there is deficiency of service on the part of opposite party.  The complainant got issued legal notice on 02.02.2012 to opposite parties.  The 1st opposite party received notice on 09.02.2012 and kept quiet.  Thereby the present complaint filed by the complainant before this Forum seeking reliefs as sought for.

5.  The notices served to the opposite parties.  On 01.11.2012 as the complainant has not shown interest for sending the notice to 2nd opposite party the complaint against 2nd opposite party is dismissed.  The complainant got issued paper publication for appearance of 1st opposite party and on 27.03.2015 the 1st opposite party was set exparte.

6.  On perusing the pleadings and the documentary evidence of the complainant the Forum framed the following points for consideration.

1]  Whether there is deficiency of service on the part of 1st opposite party?

2]  To what relief?

7.  The complainant submitted his evidence affidavit and on his behalf of Ex.A1 to A8 were marked.  The complainant adduced his arguments.

8.  Point No.1 & 2:  The present complaint filed by the complainant claiming the repair charges occurred for the Television set, Refrigerator along with the kitchen articles including compensation for causing mental agony.

9.  Ex. A1 is the consumer copy dated 24.12.2012 vide consignment note 2252 for transporting the complainant articles from Bangalore to Kakinada, A.P. State.  In that said Ex.A1 it was mentioned the household articles about 95 packs.  The amount was paid. Ex.A2 is the 2 pages details of transportation of house hold articles and furniture. Ex.A3 is quotation for packing and moving the articles which shows an amount of Rs. 25,000/- fixed transporting the vehicle and paid which was acknowledged by 1st opposite party. Ex. A4 is the legal notice dated 02.02.2012 served to the Ops claiming Rs. 20,000/- compensation for causing inconvenience articles damaged condition.  Ex.A5 & A6 are acknowledgment cards pertaining to the Ex.A4. Ex.A7 is the invoice / cash bill dated 07.02.2012 related to the repair done to the Television set an amount of Rs. 7,561/-. Ex.A8 is the invoice / bill dated 30.12.2011 for estimation of the Godrej refrigerator for repair an amount of Rs. 1950/-.  Along with the estimation paper there is a receipt given by the Southern Agencies dated 03.12.2011 which shows the refrigerator which was given to the M/s. Southern Agencies with unconditioned manner.

10.  Though the complainant has stated that his television set, refrigerator and cot including other kitchen articles were damaged the complainant has shown only 2 documentary proofs for repairing the television set vide Ex.A7 and repairing refrigerator vide Ex.A8

11. Ex.A2 details of the house hold articles vide serial No. 25 in 2nd page discloses that the complainant has sent the Sony Television in transportation.  In Ex.A2 house hold articles vide serial No. 1Similarly in Ex.A3 house hold articles the refrigerator clause was marked with a ball point pen.

12. Observing the Ex.A3 estimation, Ex.A1 consignment note along with Ex.A2 details of articles and Ex.A7 & A8 documents the complainant has to sent the Sony Television and refrigerator along with other house hold articles from Bangalore to Kakinada, A.P. Wherein, in that transmission of transportation of articles refrigerator and the television set were damages for the complainant has spent Rs. 9,511/- i.e. Rs. 1950/- for refrigerator repair + 7561/- for television set repair.

13.  Hence on perusal of Ex. A3, Ex.A1 issued by 1st opposite party along with Exs. A2, A7 & A8 we are conclusive opinion that there is deficiency of service on part of opposite parties in transporting the house hold articles pertaining to the complainant in negligent manner.

14.  As per No.13 supra, we came to conclusion that there is deficiency of service on the part of 1st opposite party in transporting the house hold articles of the complainant.  Now we have to determine to what extent of reliefs the complainant is entitled. 

15.  On perusal of Ex.A3, Ex.A2, Ex.A7 & Ex.A8 we are off conclusive opinion is that the 1st opposite party is liable to pay an amount of Rs.9,511/- along with interest @ 12% p.a. from 07.02.2012 [i.e. date of Ex.A7] to the complainant for damaging his refrigerator and television set.  As the 12% interest is awarded to the complainant from the date of Ex.A7 we hold the complainant has not entitled for compensation except costs for legal expenditure Rs. 3,000/-.  According point Nos. 1 & 2 are answered.

16.  In the result, the complaint is allowed in part. The complaint against 2nd opposite party is dismissed.  The 1st opposite party is liable to pay an amount of Rs.9,511/-     [ Rupees nine thousand five hundred and eleven only] along with interest @ 12% p.a. from 07.02.2012 to the complainant.  The 1st opposite party is liable to pay an amount of Rs. 3,000/- [ Rupees three thousand only] to the complainant towards costs for legal expenditure.  Time for compliance of this order is 30 days from the date of the receipt of this order. 

Dictation taken by Steno, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by us, in open Forum, this the 30th day of June, 2015

Sd/-xxxx                                                                                              Sd/-xxxxx

MEMBER                                                                                            PRESIDENT [FAC]

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For complainant

Sri Komarina Srihari

For opposite party :  NIL

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For complainant:-

Ex. A1 24.12.2012               Consumer copy vide consignment note 2252 for transporting the complainant articles from Bangalore to                                                      Kakinada, A.P. State. 

Ex.A2                                   Details of transportation of house hold articles and furniture.

Ex.A3                                   Quotation for packing and moving the articles which  shows an amount of Rs. 25,000/-

Ex. A4 02.02.2012               Legal notice served to the opposite parties claiming Rs.20,000/- compensation for causing inconvenience

                                                articles damaged condition

Ex.A5                                     Acknowledgment

Ex.A6                                     Acknowledgment

Ex.A7                                     Invoice / cash bill of Rs. 7,561/-

Ex.A8                                     Invoice / bill of Rs. 1950/-

For opposite parties:-           NIL

Sd/-xxxx                                                                                                Sd/-xxxxxxx

MEMBER                                                                                             PRESIDENT [FAC]

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.V.V.L.NARASIMHA RAO]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. S.BHASKAR RAO]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.