West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/47/2020

Rina Sardar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Alchemist Township India Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Ved Sharma

11 Mar 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/47/2020
( Date of Filing : 05 Feb 2020 )
 
1. Rina Sardar
Chaukhanda Chitauli Takla Bazar,Rohtas,Bihar-821113.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Alchemist Township India Ltd.
15, Ganesh Chandra Avenue, 4th Floor, Dharmatala, Kolkata-700013 and 204, 2nd Floor, 25A, PArk Street, Kolkata-700016.
2. Sucheta Khemka, Wholetime Director of M/S. Alchemist Township India Ltd.
House no.649-B,Basant Avenue, Amritsar-143001.
3. Satyendra Kumar Singh, Director of M/S. Alchemist Township India Ltd.
Gram-Fulli,P.O.Dighita, P.S. Kochas, Disghita,Rohtas,Bihar-821112.
4. Jai Prakash Singh,Director, M/S. Alchemist Township India Ltd.
Chaukhanda Chitauli Takla Bazar,Rohtas,Bihar-821113.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Sukla Sengupta PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Reyazuddin Khan MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Ved Sharma, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 11 Mar 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Order No. 25                         Dated: 11.03.2024

Today is fixed for SR, but no SR has yet been received.

Ld. Advocate for the complainant who submits so many words that since he has sincerely attempted but till date he could not be able to serve the notices upon the OPs Alchemist Township India Ltd. unfortunately.  Considered.

On close scrutiny of the materials on record it appears that the complainant has filed this case on 05.02.2020.  But unfortunately till date he could not be able to serve the notices upon the OPs due to want of specific address. It also reveals from the materials on record that the complainant has got ample opportunities together but in vain to serve the notices upon the OPs.

Under such circumstances this Commission is of view that it would be better to dismissed the Consumer Complaint at this stage due to want of service of notices upon the OPs with liberty given to the complainant to issue afresh if proper address could gather by the complainant.

Hence, the Consumer Complaint is dismissed.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sukla Sengupta]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Reyazuddin Khan]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.