Order No. 11 dt. 19.09.2016

                Heard Ld.Advocate for the petitioner. Perused the petition filed by the petitioner and also perused the document.

          The fact of this petition is that the petitioner purchased property from the undivided share of a portion of land measuring an area of 905.016 Kanal at Bahanta and Tila, Tehsil Kolaras Dist. Of Shivpuri, M.P. at a Rs.25000/- on 30.09.2009 from the O.Ps and thereafter the petitioner filed this document and filed case claiming to be a consumer on the basis of the said agreement.

          Ld.Advocate for the petitioner also submits that he filed one amendment petition after filing of this case and he submits before this Forum to hear the amendment petition along with the admission petition in which he narrated the cause of action and also enhanced the compensation amount and litigation cost.

                                                DECISION WITH REASONS

          From the very fact of this case that the petition is stating the facts of specific performance of Contract under the Specific Relief Act and he is not a consumer of any goods. So the petition of complaint cannot be entertained by this Forum as this Forum is not competent to pass any justified order on the basic facts of this case. So the petition is considered and rejected.

          Hence it is ordered that the Case No. 17/2016 is not admissible and the same is hereby rejected.