West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/288/2020

Mehtab Alam - Complainant(s)

Versus

Akhtar Hossain - Opp.Party(s)

Ashim Kumar Pramanick

08 Jan 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/288/2020
( Date of Filing : 11 Dec 2020 )
 
1. Mehtab Alam
Z-5/195/9/C, Bagdi Para Road, P.O. Badartalla, P.S. Nadial, Kolkata-700044.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Akhtar Hossain
Z-3/428/A, Jellia Para Road, Goli No.-14, Warish Nagar, P.O. Badartala, P.S. Nadial, Kolkata-700044.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Ashim Kumar Pramanick, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 08 Jan 2021
Final Order / Judgement

Order No. 03  Date-   08.01.2021.

            The case is taken up for order on the point of admission.

            The matter was heard on 06.01.2021.

Perused the consumer complaint coupled with Promissory Note dated 20.02.2020. The case of the complainant is a nutshell is that the OP has constructed a four storied building at KMC Premises No. Z-3/428/A, Jallia Para Road, Kolkata-700044 and the complainant has purchased a flat measuring about 524 sq. ft. on the second floor of the said premises at a total consideration of Rs. 4,00,000/-. It is further case of the complainant is that the OP has already handed over possession of the subject flat but did not execute and register  Deed of Conveyance in spite of several request. The OP also executed a Promissory Note dated 20.02.2020 in favour of the complainant and willing to refund Rs. 4,00,000/- to the complainant by 2/3 installments but  the complainant did not agree of such proposal.

Fact remains that no Agreement for Sale was executed between the complainant and the OP in respect of the flat in question and no possession letter is forthcoming on the part of the complainant to establish that he is in possession of the flat. On the contrary, document dated 20.02.2020 goes to show that it is a Promissory Note by which the OP agreed to refund Rs. 4,00,000/- to the complainant within 2020 by 2/3 installments. In our view, the dispute in question as alleged in the consumer complaint is not amenable in this Commission. As such, the consumer complaint is not admitted and liable to be dismissed in limini.

Hence,

Ordered

That the consumer complaint is not admitted and dismissed in limini. Complainant may agitate his grievance before the competent court of law, if so desired.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.