Kerala

Kollam

CC/203/2020

Sabu, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Akhil.S.K, - Opp.Party(s)

11 Mar 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Civil Station , Kollam-691013.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/203/2020
( Date of Filing : 11 Sep 2020 )
 
1. Sabu,
Chaithanya,Thazham,Karimpinpuzha.P.O,Pangodu-691507.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Akhil.S.K,
Sales Executive,Cholamandalam General Insurance Company,Kottarakkara,Kollam.
2. Jelin.J.Fernandes,
Assistant Sales Manager, Cholamandalam General Insurance Company,Kottarakkara.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 11 Mar 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL  COMMISSION, KOLLAM

Dated this the   11th   Day of  March      2022

  Present: -  Sri. E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LL.M. President

       Smt.S.Sandhya Rani, Bsc, L.L.B,Member

        Sri.Stanly Harold, B.A.LLB, Member

 

                                                                          CC.203/2020

 

Sabu                                                                      :           Complainant

Chaithanya,Thazham,

Karimpinpuzha P.O

Pangodu.

V/s

  1. Akhil.S.K                                                        :           Opposite parties

          Sales Executive

        Cholamandalam General Insurance Company

        Kottarakkara, Kollam.

  1.  Jelin.J.Fernandaz

          Assistant Sales Manager

         Cholamandalam General Insurance Company

          Kottarakkara.

        [By Adv.Renu.G.Pillai&Adv.M.A.Naushad]

FINAL   ORDER

E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM , B.A, LL.M, President

            Complainant absent though notice was served.  Hence we are of the view that the complainant is not interested in adducing evidence.  The complainant has not produced any reliable documentary evidence along with the complaint, not even filed a copy of the complaint alleged to have been filed at the police station.  The alleged policy issued to him or its copy also not produced.  There is absolutely no materials to substantiate that the complainant has paid Rs.9111/- to the 1st opposite party.  There is absolutely no materials produced along with the complaint to substantiate the case of the complaint.

            In the result complaint stands dismissed.

            No costs.

       Dated this the  11th   day of    March   2022.

E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim:Sd/-

           S.Sandhya Rani:Sd/-

           Stanly Harold:Sd/-

            Forwarded/by Order

           Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.