Chandigarh

StateCommission

FA/46/2014

Nidhish Goel - Complainant(s)

Versus

Akash Logistic Packers & Movers - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Arun KUmar Adv.

11 Feb 2014

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/46/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )
 
1. Nidhish Goel
Chd.
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

U.T., CHANDIGARH

                                                         

First Appeal No.

:

46 of 2014

Date of Institution

:

06.02.2014

Date of Decision

:

11.02.2014

 

1.Nidhish Goel s/o Dr. Sudheesh Goel, resident of H.No.3343, Sector 23-D, Chandigarh.

2.Seema Goel w/o Dr. Sudheesh Goel, resident of H.No.3343, Sector 23-D, Chandigarh.

 

……Appellants/complainants

V e r s u s

1. Akash Logistic Packers & Movers through its Proprietor/Partner 
B O : Shahid Bhagat Singh Market, Near Toll Tax, Delhi UP Border, P.O. Chikamberpur, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad-110032.

2. The Proprietor/Partner, Akash Logistic Packers & Movers B O: Shahid Bhagat Singh Market, Near Toll Tax, Delhi UP Border, P.O. Chikamberpur, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad-110032.

3. Amritsar Transport Company, through its Proprietor/Partner, 11, Transport Nagar, Sector 26, Chandigarh.

4. The Proprietor/Partner, Amritsar Transport Company, 11, Transport Nagar, Sector 26, Chandigarh.

 

 

 

Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

BEFORE:  

               

               

Argued by:

 

PER JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.), PRESIDENT

             

2.            

3.           

4.            It was further stated that the goods were received, in the premises of Opposite Parties No.3 and 4, in intact condition, as handed over to them, by Opposite Parties No.1 and 2, but the complainants failed to take delivery of the same. It was further stated that legal notice received by Opposite Parties No.3 and 4 was duly replied to, detailing therein, that there was no deficiency, on their part. It was further stated that neither there was any deficiency, in rendering service, on the part of 

5.           6.           7.           

8.            

9.           

10.        

11.        

12.        

13.        

14.        

15.        

 

Pronounced.

February 11, 2014

Sd/-

[JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.)]

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

Sd/-

(DEV RAJ)

MEMBER

 

 

 

Rg

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.