Chandigarh

StateCommission

A/105/2018

Chitkara University - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ajay Parbhakar - Opp.Party(s)

13 Nov 2018

ORDER

It is stated by Counsel for the parties that directions given by the Forum in judgment under challenge dated 26.03.2018 at (i) & (ii), which reads thus, stood complied with and the appellant/University will not adopt any such like practice in future :-

“i.                    To immediately discontinue the restrictive trade practice of forcing the complainants to purchase the annual material for their children from the school only.

ii.                     To strictly ensure compliance of instructions, rules or notifications with regard to the safe transportation policy for students.”

                   Taking note of the same, both the Counsel for the parties, on getting instructions from their client, state that the matter stands satisfied.

                   In view of warning given, the appellant is directed to be strict about security of the children.

                   Accordingly, this appeal stands disposed of, by making it very clear that findings given by the Forum in the order dated 26.03.2018 shall not be read against the appellant as a precedent.

                   In terms of notice of motion issued by this Commission on 07.05.2018, the appellant/University had deposited an amount of Rs.1,75,000/- with this Commission. We release the aforesaid amount in favour of the appellant alongwith interest, if any, accrued thereupon. Needful shall be done seven working days from today.

                   Certified copies of this order be sent to the parties, free of charge.