Kerala

Malappuram

CC/86/2019

SIDDIKUE PANATTU - Complainant(s)

Versus

AIRPORT MANAGER - Opp.Party(s)

17 Nov 2020

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
MALAPPURAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/86/2019
( Date of Filing : 07 Mar 2019 )
 
1. SIDDIKUE PANATTU
PANATHU HOUSE SOUTH ANNARA TIRUR
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. AIRPORT MANAGER
GULF AIR PADINHARATHARA CALICUT AIRPORT MALAPPURAM
2. GENERAL MANAGER
GULF AIR MAKER CHAMBERS V NARIMAN POINT MUMBAI
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. PREETHI SIVARAMAN C PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. MOHANDASAN K MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 17 Nov 2020
Final Order / Judgement

ORDER

By Smt. PREETHI SIVARAMAN.C, MEMBER  (President In-Charge)

 

 

1.          Complainant is a 53 year old man working   for his livelihood at Damam and he is suffering   with many ailments.   Case of the complainant is that  he booked a ticket from Damam to Kozhikode in  Gulf Air  and opposite parties  issued a ticket  from Damam to Kozhikode via Bahrain. As per the ticket issued, the Gulf Air will take the complainant from Damam on 3-10-2018 at 18.55 hours  and they will reach in Kozhikode International Air port on 4-10-2018 at 04.30 hours.  Complainant reached the airport in time  with his  all belonging  and  the opposite parties informed the complainant that they will first take the complainant to Bahrain and from there to Kozhikode in another flight.  The flight was scheduled at 18.55 hours  but it left Damam Airport at 8 O’clock in the evening on 3-10-2018 and the flight reached at Bahrain airport within half an  hour. When he reached Bahrain Airport, he contacted the staff of opposite parties and they informed that they cannot take complainant to Kozhikode as scheduled and they will make alternative arrangements and directed to wait for some time. But waiting continuous till now .

2.          Complainant was not having money to purchase food from the airport  and he was virtually  lying on the ground and he was not able to  sit in the chair  due to the excruciating  pain.   There was no one to help the complainant and the Gulf Air staff  left  their office without any intimation.  At 4.30 in the morning a Police man came and offered tea and he contacted the opposite party Gulf Air authorities.  By the interference of that policeman, the complainant was taken to a hotel outside the Airport by the opposite party officials by 7.30 in the morning.   On 03-10-2018 from 8.00 PM to 7.30 AM,   complainant  was suffering. The temperature was very low in airport and  was having severe pain.  He stayed in the Airport  without any sweaters or thermals, painkillers, food,  hot water,  no proper seats or  bed and he suffered a lot.   Since the passport was taken by the opposite parties, the complainant was not able to go out and see the doctor.  Complainant was having three boxes full of luggage and there was no one to help at the airport. 

3.              Complainant reached in Kozhikode Airport on 5-10-2018 by 5.00 AM.  There was no one to take him to his house.  Complainant become a mentally ill person, he is now having uncontrolled hypertension after this incident. Complainant need month long treatment and the job will be lost and it is a horrifying experience for him.  After reaching India  complainant submitted a complaint to the first opposite party and they had given a toll free No.1-800-1237474  which nobody responded.   Opposite party even after getting a complaint not even contacted the complainant.  Hence this complaint. Complainant claiming a compensation of Rs.5,00,000/-(Rupees Five lakh only) from the opposite parties for the hardships  suffered.

4.           Notice sent from this Forum through speed post and opposite parties appeared  through  their counsel  and filed version, counter affidavit and documents.

5.            In their version  they submitted that  complaint is not maintainable either in law or on facts.  They admitted that  complainant booked for travel in    the Gulf Air flight 110/GF 260 from Dammam to Kozhikode via Bahrain  on 03-10-2018.   They again submitted that Gulf Air Flight from Dammam  to Bahrain  on 3-10-2018 was hit by  a bird  strike  at the  Dammam Airport  while on take off  and it  resulted in  delay of 72 minutes  for inspection and certification   of the airworthiness of the Aircraft.   That  flight  on that date was slightly  delayed by another  14 minutes due to operational reasons  including  time taken for  locating  a missing passenger  and thus  there was  a total delay of 86  minutes for the flight.  The delay of 72 minutes took as the concerned Engineer had to be called from his home to carry out the bird hit inspection and for confirming the airworthiness of the flight. It was for the safety of passengers such meticulous inspection was conducted as per standard protocol. 

6.         Consequent to the aforesaid delay, the flight from Dammam to Bahrain could reach at Bahrain only at 20.59 hours and the connection flight from Bahrain to Kozhikode was scheduled for departure at 21.25 and it was not found practical to carry the complainant to the said flight.   The late arrival of the above flight from  Dammam to Bahrain was because of the  aforementioned reason which was  absolutely beyond the   control of the opposite parties.  Again they submitted that the complainant was provided with food and accommodation in Golden Tulip star hotel in Bahrain on 03-10-2018.   He was rebooked for travel from Bahrain to Calicut in next available Gulf Air flight itself ie, GF260 on 4-10-2018 and complainant reached Calicut at 4.30 AM on 05-10-2018.  No personal and physical inconvenience caused to the complainant.    

 7.          As the bird hit was occurred at Dammam Airport and it had become impossible for the Airline to arrange any alternate aircraft within short time  to operate the flight to Bahrain on 03-10-2018 , so as to avoid inconvenience to any passenger to get his connection flight.   Hence  opposite parties are  legally not liable to pay  any compensation to the complainant as claimed  and there is no negligence on their side.

8.            In order to substantiate the case of the complainant, he filed an affidavit and the documents produced were marked as Ext.A1 to A4.  Ext. A1 is the original medical certificate issued by Dr. Kajakaran dated 11-02-2013 regarding  complainant’s mental status. Ext. A2 is the photocopy of Air ticket  . Ext.A3  is the photocopy of Boarding Pass from Bahrain to Kozhikode.  Ext.A4 is the photocopy of Boarding Pass from Dammam to Bahrain.

9.         Thereafter, opposite parties appeared and filed affidavit and one document and that is marked as Ext.B1. Ext B1 series are the copies of WOTP- Daily Movement Report dated 3-10-2018.

10.       Points arise for consideration.

1.  Whether there is any deficiency of service  on the part of opposite parties?

2. If so , Relief and cost?

11. Point No.1

          Case of the complainant is that  complainant booked an Air  ticket from Dammam to Kozhikode  in  Gulf Air  and opposite parties  issued a ticket  from Dammam to Kozhikode via Baharin.  As per the ticket issued , opposite parties  will take the complainant  from Dammam on 3-10-2018 at 18.55 hours  and  will reach Kozhikode International Air port on 4-10-2018 at 04.30 hours.    The flight was scheduled at 18.55 hours but it left Dammam Airport at 8 O’clock in the evening on 3-10-2018. At Bahrain Air port, opposite parties officials are not there and complainant suffered a lot. He is a patient. Complainant was taken to hotel outside the Airport by the opposite partie’s officials by 7.30 in the morning. From 8.00 PM on 3-10-2018 to 7.30 AM on 4-10-2018 complainant suffered a lot.

12.        In the version and counter affidavit  opposite parties admitted that  complainant  booked a ticket for travel in  Gulf Air flight  GF110/4F260 from Dammam to Calicut via Bahrain on 3-10-2018.  Their submission regarding the reason for delay from Dammam was genuine.  They  produced Ext B1 document which clearly  reveals  that  the above flight  hit by a bird strike  at Dammam  Airport while on  takeoff  and it resulted in  delay of  72 minutes  due to  inspection and certification of airworthiness of the Aircraft.  14 minutes delay due to operational reasons including time taken for locating  a missing passenger.  Delay of 72 minutes took as Engineer had to be called from his home.  Hence total delay is 86 minutes.  It was for the safety of passengers. The above facts are clear from Ext. B1 documents and the aforementioned reason which was absolutely beyond the control of opposite parties.   That is true. 

13.          But the second portion is  not beyond the control of opposite parties.  There also they submitted that they provided  food and accommodation to complainant in a starred hotel namely Golden Tulip in Bahrain  and also given alternate carriage in the next available flight .  That is also true.   But opposite party is no where mentioned,  when did they provided the hotel  to complainant.  As per complainant’s case  he is a sick person mentally and physically . After reaching Bahrain Air port at 18.55 hours , he contacted  staff of opposite parties  and they stated that they cannot take the complainant to Kozhikode as scheduled and they will make alternative arrangements.   But there was no one to help and  the Gulf Air staff left their office  without any intimation.  Complainant  was not having any money to purchase food from the Airport .  He was not able to sit in the chair  due  to excruciating  pain  and he was virtually  lying on the ground.  By 4.30 in the morning one  Police man enquired   and he offered  tea to complainant  and contacted the opposite parties.  Thereafter  opposite parties  officials  told that  they arranged the flight  in the evening .

14.          As per complainant’s case  he stated that due to the inference of the above police man , the complainant was taken  to  a hotel outside the airport by the opposite party’s officials  by 7.30 in the morning . From the hotel , he got food and rest. From 8.PM on 3-10-2018 to 7.30 AM on 4-10-2018 complainant was suffering a lot is partly correct because  opposite parties not mentioned in their affidavit or version  about when they  provided  the room and food to the complainant.   It is clear deficiency of service on the part of opposite parties.  In Ext. B1  the Daily Movement Report they only submitted that customer was provided with  accommodation at Golden Tulip hotel  on 3-10-2018 but not mentioned about the time.  Complainant is a  mentally weak person which clearly shows in Ext. A1 documents and his contention regarding the low Airport temperature is also believable.  He was not having any sweaters and pain killer tablets, hot water and more over no seat or bed to relax.  The contention of   the complainant  is believable  because  he filed this  complaint before the Commission only because he is suffered a lot in the airport due to the negligent act of the opposite parties at Airport.  So clear negligence and deficiency of service on the part of opposite parties.

15.        But complainant’s statement  regarding    there was  no one to take him to his house on 5-10-2018 is childish.  It is not the duty of opposite parties  to receive the complainant at Calicut Air port and dropped him to his house. Another contention of complainant is that he became  mentally ill person due to this and  he is now having  uncontrolled hypertension. But as per Ext. A1 document, the report given by Dr. Kajakaran stated that  complainant was  his patient  for the last ten years  for treatment of Schizophrenia. Hence  the mental illness caused to the complainant is not due to the  above incident. In the complaint, complainant pointed out that after reaching India  he  submitted a complaint to the first opposite party and  they had given toll free No. 1-800-1237474  which nobody responded.  But complainant  did not produce  documents  to clarify the above point.

16.         The delay caused  at Dammam Airport is beyond the control of opposite parties is true.  But it is the duty of opposite parties to provide alternate arrangements   to complainant after reaching Bahrain Airport.  Complainant’s version  about reaching Bahrain Airport  and the  inconveniences caused  to him is clear  from  his submissions .  As per Ext. B1 document  opposite parties provided accommodation at Golden Tulip hotel on 3-10-2018 . But not mentioned about the time. Nobody will approach a Court or Commission  without causing  personal  inconvenience and hurt to them.   Since he is a layman and  sometimes  he may have been scared  when  he got into the Bahrain  Airport. Sometimes he got the  accommodation at mid night. But as an ordinary person  having some mental illness (As per Ext. A1) and other physical illness  will surely get irritated. So there is clear deficiency of service from the side of opposite parties for a short span of time.  Hence they  are liable. 

17.   Point No.2    

                      In view of the above findings, this Commission allows the complaint as follows:-

  1. Opposite parties directed to pay Rs. 45,000/-(Rupees Forty five   thousand only) being the compensation for the deficiency of service  committed by the opposite parties and thereby caused  inconvenience and hardships to the complainant .
  2. The opposite parties are directed to pay Rs. 5,000/-(Rupees Five  thousand only) as cost of the proceedings.

      The liabilities of the opposite parties shall be joint and several.

The opposite parties shall comply with this order within one month from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, failing whichthe complainant is entitled to get12% interestupon the said amount from the date of receipt of the copy of this order till realization.

 

                                                                                               

 

            Dated  this 17th  day  of November,  2020.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PREETHI SIVARAMAN C]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. MOHANDASAN K]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.