^{UNIONTERRITORY,CHANDIGARH}

R.K.Sharma s/o Late Sh.Om Parkash, r/o H.No.79, Sector 19-A,Chandigarh

^{….…Appellant/Complainant}

^{V E R S U S}

1].     IndiaShyamFashionMall & MukutHospital, Sector 34-A, Chandigarh-160034.

2]      Gurudwara Rakabganj Road,New Delhi

Head Quarter :AirIndiaBuilding, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021.

^{.…..Respondents/Opposite Parties}

BEFORE:

Argued by:Sh.Vikas Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

PER PADMA PANDEY, MEMBER

2.                    In brief, the facts of the case are that, the complainant, a reputed businessman, in order to attend a marriage ceremony atUdaipur, purchased air tickets of AirIndiaChandigarhDelhiDelhiUdaipur The complainant reached the airport well in time, and made check-in.  Udaipur Udaipur    Chandigarh 

3.                    In their joint written reply, the Opposite Parties admitted the booking of air tickets of the complainant fromChandigarhNew DelhiUdaipur.  Chandigarh Chandigarh, and also did not allow the security atUdaipur 

4.                    The Parties led evidence, in support of their case.

5.                    After hearing the Counsel for the parties, and, on going through the evidence and record of the case, the District Forum, dismissed the complaint. 

6.                    Feeling aggrieved, the instant appeal, has been filed by the appellant/complainant.

7.                    We have heard the Counsel for the appellant/complainant, and have gone through the evidence and record of the case, carefully. 

8.                    The Counsel for the appellant/complainant submitted that the complainant had to attend the marriage IndiaChandigarhDelhiDelhiUdaipur.  Udaipur. On reachingUdaipur, the complainant was shocked to see that the security strip as well as security sticker of his baggage were broken and found that the total amount of Rs.1,81,000/- lying therein was missing. He further submitted that the complainant requested the officials of the Airport but they did not take any action against their staff.  

9.                    After giving our thoughtful consideration, to the submissions, raised by the Counsel for the appellant/complainant and the evidence, on record, we are of the considered opinion, that the appeal is liable to be dismissed at the preliminary stage, for the reasons to be recorded hereinafter.  

13.              

14.              

15.              

Pronounced.

05.02.2014  [JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER [RETD.]

                                                                                                           [DEV RAJ]

Sd/-

^{[PADMA PANDEY]}

^MEMBER

cmg

APPEAL No. 38/2014

Argued by:  

Sh.Vikas Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

Dated ___5^th                                                                      

cmg