Chandigarh

DF-I

CP/3/2010

Inderpreet Kaur - Complainant(s)

Versus

Air Canada 202, second Floor Ansal Bhawan 16, Kasturba gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110001 through its - Opp.Party(s)

19 Feb 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM - I Plot No 5- B, Sector 19 B, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh - 160 019
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3 of 2010
1. Inderpreet Kaur W/o Sh. Dilbagh Singh, House No. 1185 Sectpor-43/B Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Air Canada 202, second Floor Ansal Bhawan 16, Kasturba gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110001 through its 202, Second Floor Ansal Bhawan, 16 Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110001 2. Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd. Thapar House Janpath Road New Delhi through its Managing DirectorNew Delhi ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 19 Feb 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.

CHANDIGARH

 

                                                                                                                                                Criminal Complaint No. 3 of 2010

in

Complaint Case No. 648 of 2009

 

Inderpreet Kaur   –   Applicant/Complainant

 

                        Versus

 

1.         Air Canada, New Delhi  –  OP No.2.

2.         Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd., New Delhi – OP No.3.

 

Present:         Sh.Dilbagh Singh, Husband/Authorized Representative of Complainant.      

                       

Dated, the 19th day of February, 2010.

                                                            ORDER

 

                        In view of the statement made by husband/authorized representative of complainant, this execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. The complainant would be at liberty to file afresh execution application as & when the stay order is vacated by the Hon’ble State Commission or after the decision of FA No.702 of 2009, if need be.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

                                                                                                PRESIDING OFFICER

            LOK ADALAT

 

 

 

                                    2nd MEMBER                                   1st MEMBER



DR. MADHU BEHL, MEMBERHONABLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, PRESIDENT ,