Circuit Bench Nagpur

StateCommission

A/07/436-A

BRANCH MANAGER, THE GONDIA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

AGRICULTURE INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIA LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. B. M. KHARKATE

15 Jan 2013

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR
5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1
CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001
 
First Appeal No. A/07/436-A
(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/03/2007 in Case No. CC/06/113 of District None)
 
1. BRANCH MANAGER, THE GONDIA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD.
WADEGAON, TAH. TIRORA, DISTT. GONDIA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. AGRICULTURE INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIA LTD.
STATE LEVEL CROP INSURANCE CELL STOCK EXCHANGE TOWER, 20TH FLOOR, EAST WING, DALAL STREET, FORT, MUMBAI 400 023.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Hon'ble Mr.S.M. Shembole PRESIDING MEMBER
  HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL MEMBER
  HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
None
......for the Appellant
 
Adv. Mr. Hitesh Verma for the respondent No.1
Adv. Mr. Harinkhede for the respondent No.4 to 12
Mr. Anil Gosavi authorised person of the respondent No.2
Mr. Khobragade, Secretary of the respondent No.3
......for the Respondent
ORDER

PER  MR. S.M. SHEMBOLE , HON’BLE  PRESIDING MEMBER

            None for the appellant is present. Its counsel Mr. Kharkate, Mr. Funde, and Mr. Shaikh are absent. Adv. Mr. Hitesh Verma for the respondent No.1 and Adv. Mr. Harinkhede for the respondent No.4 to 12 are present. Mr. Anil Gosavi, authorised person of the respondent No.2 and Mr. Khobragade, Secretary of the respondent No. 3 are present. The record reflects that nobody for the appellant is present since long. Therefore, on 26/04/2012 notice was issued to the appellant as well as respondents and in response to the notice the respondents appeared but nobody appeared for the appellant. No report about service of notice to appellant is received. However, the office copy of notice reflects that it was issued on the correct address of the appellant as shown in the appeal memo. Therefore it will have to be presumed that the appellant is served with notice but nobody turned up. Hence, the appeal deserves to be dismissed in default. Hence, it be recalled at 3.00 p.m. for order.

            Matter is recalled at 3,00 p.m. but nobody for the appellant is present. Hence, the appeal is dismissed in default. No order as to cost.

Dated:- 15/01/2013.

 

 
 
[ Hon'ble Mr.S.M. Shembole]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[ HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL]
MEMBER
 
[ HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.