Circuit Bench Nagpur

StateCommission

A/07/436D

Branch Manager, The Gondia District Central Co-Op. Bank Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Agricultural Insurance Co.of India Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Kharkate

15 Jan 2013

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA CIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR 5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1 CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001

First Appeal No. A/07/436D (Arisen out of Order Dated 16/03/2007 in Case No. CC/116/2006 of District None)   1. Branch Manager, The Gondia District Central Co-Op. Bank Ltd. wadegaon, Tah.Tirora, Dist. Gondia. ...........Appellant(s) Versus 1. Agricultural Insurance Co.of India Ltd. State Level Crop. Insurance Cell Stock Exchange Tower,20 th floor, East wing, Dalal Street, Fort, Mumbai. ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:     Hon'ble Mr.S.M. Shembole PRESIDING MEMBER   HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL MEMBER   HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM MEMBER

PRESENT: None ......for the Appellant   Adv. Mr. Hitesh Verma for the respondent No.1 Adv. Mr. Harinkhede for the respondent No.4 to 12 Mr. Anil Gosavi authorised person of the respondent No.2 Mr. Khobragade, Secretary of the respondent No.3 ......for the Respondent

ORDER   PER  MR. S.M. SHEMBOLE , HON’BLE  PRESIDING MEMBER               None for the appellant is present. Its counsel Mr. Kharkate, Mr. Funde, and Mr. Shaikh are absent. Adv. Mr. Hitesh Verma for the respondent No.1 and Adv. Mr. Harinkhede for the respondent No.4 to 9 are present. Mr. Anil Gosavi, authorised person of the respondent No.2 and Mr. Khobragade, Secretary of the respondent No. 3 are present. The record reflects that nobody for the appellant is present since long. Therefore, on 26/04/2012 notice was issued to the appellant as well as respondents and in response to the notice the respondents appeared but nobody appeared for the appellant. No report about service of notice to appellant is received. However, the office copy of notice reflects that it was issued on the correct address of the appellant as shown in the appeal memo. Therefore it will have to be presumed that the appellant is served with notice but nobody turned up. Hence, the appeal deserves to be dismissed in default. Hence, it be recalled at 3.00 p.m. for order.               Matter is recalled at 3,00 p.m. but nobody for the appellant is present. Hence, the appeal is dismissed in default. No order as to cost. Dated:- 15/01/2013.

[ Hon'ble Mr.S.M. Shembole] PRESIDING MEMBER   [ HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL] MEMBER   [ HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM] MEMBER