Assam

Kamrup

CC/50/2020

MR B.M.Pandey - Complainant(s)

Versus

Agarwal Packers & Movers Ltd (APML) - Opp.Party(s)

16 Aug 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KAMRUP,GUWAHATI
 
Complaint Case No. CC/50/2020
( Date of Filing : 13 Oct 2020 )
 
1. MR B.M.Pandey
S/O- Late N .Pandey, R/O- H.O- Sri Sanjay Gupta, Ground Floor, G.S.Road, ICAR Bhawan , Guwahati
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Agarwal Packers & Movers Ltd (APML)
Jatin Tamuly Complex, 2nd Floor, Vill- Goralia, Sarusajai, Mauza- Beltola, Near National Games Stadium, P.O- Sawkuchi, Basistha, Dist-Kamrup-781034
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri Akhtar Fun Ali Bora PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Shri Tutumoni Deva Goswami MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 16 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

            BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION.

                                                          KAMRUP

                                                     C.C.No.50/2020

           

   Present:          I)   Shri A.F.A.Bora, M.Sc.,L.L.B.,A.J.S(Rtd.)     -President

                         II)  Smti Archana Deka Lahkar,B.Sc.,L.L.B.         -Member

                         III) Shri Tutumoni Deva Goswami, B.A.L.L.B.   - Member     

                                                                           

                        Sri B.M.Pandey                                                  -Complainant

                        Age: 37 years

                        S/O Late N.Pandey                                                

                        G.S.Road, Kar Bhawan,

                        Guwahati, Assam  

                                        -vs-

            1)        Agarwal packers and Movers Ltd.(APML), - Opposite party

                        Jatin Tamuly Complex, 2nd floor,

                        Vill.Gorolia, Sarusajai, Mouza Beltola

                        Near National Games Stadium, P.O. Sawuchi, Basistha

                        Dist. Kamrup- 781034

            Appearance:

            For the complainant,  petitioner in person.      .

            None appeared  for the opp.party 

 

            Date of written argument:-  17.6.2022

            Date of oral argument :        28.7.2022                                                                     

            Date of judgment: -             16.8.2022         

                                                                      

 JUDGMENT

1)          This is a complaint filed  by  one Sri B.M.Pandey , G.S.Road, Guwahati  against Agarwal packers and Movers Ltd.(APML),  Jatin Tamuly Complex, 2nd floor,Vill.Gorolia, Sarusajai, Mouza Beltola Near National Games Stadium, P.O. Sawuchi, Basistha ,Dist. Kamrup- 781034. The case was admitted on 13.10.2020. The opp.party did not submit written statement and on 9.3.2021 as order was passed by this commission for exparte hearing against the opp.party. Accordingly, the complainant filed evidence and written argument and  on 17.6.2022 complainant himself submitted his argument and today is fixed for delivery of judgment.

2)    The brief fact of the complainant is that for transportation of household goods  and a two wheeler from Trivandrum , Kerala to Silchar Assam on 11.9.2020 the complainant  paid an amount of Rs. 80,000/- out of Rs.1,34,000/- (Rupees one lakh thirty four thousand) only  to the opp.party. On 16.9.2020 while the complainant was on the way to Silchar from Trivandrum , he received a call from the opp.party that goods in question have reached Kolkata and held up there , and same will not be moved  unless full amount is done. The complainant contacted the op.party and requested to send the goods immediately as he had no proper required items for  use at his Silchar residence .

3)         The complainant alleges that he had requested to unload one of the items at Barpeta road, Assam , but they did not do so and instead  moved all items to their godown at Guwahati . On 22.9.2020 the op.party from Guwahati informed that goods are lying in the godown  and will not be sent unless full payment is done, in addition the opp.party will charge for keeping the goods at their godown. The complainant prays for a direction directing the  opp.party to pay Rs.2,00,000/- compensation for mental agony and physical harassment suffered by the complainant along with Rs.50,000/- as cost of the proceeding and any other relief the complainant is entitled for .

4)            The complainant filed his evidence  on affidavit  by exhibiting the following documents,

            (I)  Ext.1 is his address proof, 

            (II) Ext.2 is the quotation dtd. 5.9.2020 issued by Agarwal  Packers & Movers Ltd. ,

            (III) Ext.3 is the goods consignment note dated 9.9.2020 issued by  Agarwal  Packers & Movers Ltd. ,

            (IV) Ext.4 is the tax invoice 11.9..2020 issued by Agarwal  Packers & Movers Ltd. ,

            (V)  Ext.5 is the money receipt dtd. 11.9.2020 issued by Agarwal  Packers & Movers Ltd. ,

            (VI) Ext.6 is the money receipt dtd. 11.9.2020 issued by Agarwal  Packers & Movers Ltd. ,

            (VII) Ext.7 is the inventory sheet dated 11.9.2020 issued by Agarwal  Packers & Movers Ltd. ,

            (VIII) Ext.8 is the  bill of supply dtd. 11.9.2020 issued by Agarwal  Packers & Movers Ltd. ,

(IX) Ext.9 is the copy of the online complaint dtd. 21.9.2020,    

(X) Ext.10 is the copy of the e.mail response dtd. 22.9.2020  from  Agarwal  Packers & Movers Ltd.

5)              We have perused all the documents along with the petition no. 72/22  dtd. 21.1.2022 filed by the complainant  and found that opp.party had delivered the consignment at Guwahati   on the night of 19.11.2021  and balance payment amount of Rs.58,268/- was paid through online payment on 20.11.2021. As the booking was done for delivery to Silchar , but consignment was delivered at Guwahati , the opp.party has refunded Rs.28,000/- on 27.12.2021. The complainant alleges that the goods delivered are found damaged . When the complainant consulted the authorized dealer for inspection a quotation was provided to the complainant for expenses to be incurred for repairing the refrigerator , two wheeler and inverter. The complainant  submits along    with the petition 3 no.s  of  quotation  from (a) Royal Enfield (b)LG and (c) Luminous.

6)        Now from record it is found that the complainant booked his consignment on 11.9.2020 by paying an advance amount of Rs.80,000/- for transportation from Trivandrum Kerala to Silchar , Assam  . But the complainant received  the said consignment on 9.11.2021 at Guwahati  , although it was supposed to be delivered at Silchar, Assam. The complainant for receiving the items at Guwahati paid an amount of Rs.58,268/- to the opp.party.. It is also found that the opp.party has refunded an amount of Rs. 28,000/- on 27.11.2021 to the complainant  as the goods in question were delivered at Guwahati, Assam instead of Silchar , Assam.

7)        The opp.party delivered the household items of the complainant on 19.11.2021  i.e. after 14 months from the date of booking i.e. 11.9.2020 in a damaged condition.  The opp.party  delivered the goods at Guwahati, Assam  instead of Silchar , Assam.

8)        Due to the act of opp.party the complainant suffered  a lot for a period of 1 year 2 months . This is a clear case of deficiency in service  committed by the opp.party to the complainant by not delivering  his household items  at Silchar, Assam, although the complainant booked his household items with the opp.party from Trivandrum, Kerala to Silchar, Assam  .

9)        The complainant  established his case against the negligent Act of the opp.party  for which complainant is entitled for compensation for mental agony and physical harassment  as well as for loss and  damage  to the property of the complainant  caused owing to negligent Act of the opp.pary.

10)                  We have gone through the record and found that  it  is   really  a very pathetic situation with a person  who booked his essential belongings with the opp.party for transportation in the month of September/2020 and   received it after a long period of more than 1 year  at the destination  other than that when it was booked for delivery at Guwahati, Assam, but surprisingly after filing this case the complainant received back  the goods after making another  payment of Rs.58,268/- that too not at Silchar, only at Guwahati, Assam. This act  of the opp.party itself found  unjustified and unfair trade practice for gaining money  for the business of transportation of goods without giving the valued items to the complainant for a long period of time beyond the actual transportation time of the goods  from Trivandrum to Silchar, Assam.

11)                  Under the above circumstances,  we  are of the view that expenditure incurred and the damage  cause to the property of the complainant  is amounting to Rs.75,000/- as claimed by the complainant for repairing of belongings damaged owing to   non-delivery of the goods in time . The claimant orally submits that he had to incur   Rs.75,000/- for repairing of his articles owing to the damage   caused during  the period of such  detention of goods.

12)                  In the above circumstances, we are of the view that the complainant have received back the goods only after filing this case and opp.party compelled the complainant to make the full payment  at Guwahati  before delivering the articles  at  Silchar which is also an  act  of inconsistent  with normal transportation agreement or commitment made by the packer and movers  i.e. the op.party and is a clear case of deficiency in service  committed by   opp.party.

                                                        ORDER 

                        Hence, opp.party is directed  to make a payment of Rs.2,00,000/- as compensation as claimed  by the complainant  for the  aforesaid act and   to pay the cost of proceeding amounting to Rs.50,000/-. The total decretal amount is to be paid  within 45 days  from the date of judgment  failing which the op.party have to pay an interest  @12% from the date of judgment  till realization .

                        Given under our hand and seal of the District Commission,   Kamrup,  this the   16th day of   August /2022.

           

            ( Smti Archana Deka Lahkar  )                    (Shri Tutumoni Deva Goswami)                                 (Shri A.F.A.Bora  )

                     Member                                                                Member                                                        President

           

            Dictated and corrected by me

            ( Shri A.F.A.Bora  )

            President,

            District Consumer Commission, Kamrup.

           

            Typed by me

            (Smt Juna Borah )

            Stenographer,

            District Consumer Commission, Kamrup.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri Akhtar Fun Ali Bora]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Shri Tutumoni Deva Goswami]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.