Date of Filing      : 15.09.2016
                                                                                                                        Date of Disposal: 31 .05.2022

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVALLUR

 BEFORE  TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L, Ph.D (Law)                            .…. PRESIDENT
                 THIRU. J.JAYASHANKAR, B.A, B.L.                                                                      ..… MEMBER-I
                 THIRU P.MURUGAN, B.Com.,                                                                              ….. MEMBER-II
CC. No.44/2016
THIS TUESDAY, THE 31th  DAY OF MAY 2022

Mr.R.Venkatesh,
S/o.Late S.Ramachandran,
Flat No.202, Harmony Ananya, Anna Main Road,
KK.Nagar, Chennai -600 078.                                                                                    ......Complainant.
                                                                                       //Vs//
1.Agarwal Packers and Movers Limited,
   220, Kabra Complex,
   61, M.G.Road, Ranikunj, Secunderabad – 500 003.

2.Mr.Dayanand Agarwal, 
   Chairman & Managing Director,
   Agarwal Pacters and Movers limited, 220, Kabra Complex,
   61, M.G.Road, Ranikunj, Secunderabad – 500 003.

3.Mr.Krishna Reddy,
    Mr.Murali Krishna and Mr.Rajesh Chaturvedi,
   Claims Department,
   No.4/706A, G.N.T.Road Padinallur, Chennai 600 052.

4.DRS Diip Packers and Movers,
    3rd Floor, Kabra Complex, 61- M.G. Road,
    Secunderabad, 500 003.                                                                                     .......Opposite parties. 

ORDER
PRONOUNCED BY TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI,   PRESIDENT.

               The complaint was filed by the complainant U/S 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 alleging deficiency in service in transporting the complainant’s goods from Hyderabad to Chennai along with direction to direct the opposite parties to pay compensation of Rs.30,000/- with interest 32% per annum towards the charges incurred in repairing the damaged articles and to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-for service hardship, mental agony, pain and for suffering and to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards deficiency in service and damages.
Opposites parties 1, 3 and 4 present.  No representation for complainant in spite of sufficient opportunities given to appear and to prosecute.  The complainant could not be contacted inspite of best efforts. Hence we are of the view that there is no purpose in keeping the complaint on file.  Consumer Complaint is dismissed for non prosecution.  No costs.

This order was pronounced by us in the open Commission on this 31th May 2022. 

 Sd/-                                                                Sd/-                                                                Sd/-
MEMBER-II                                                MEMBER-I                                                    PRESIDENT