Haryana

Ambala

CC/91/2011

SANJEEV BATRA - Complainant(s)

Versus

AEROVISION - Opp.Party(s)

B.S GARG

30 Sep 2015

ORDER

                                                                                                                                                                   CC No.91 of 2011

                                                                       Sanjeev Batra Vs. Aerovision

Present:          None for complainant.

                        Sh. Keshav Sharma, Adv. for OP No.1.

                        Sh. Rajiv Sachdeva, Adv. for OP No.2.

                        Case called several times since morning but neither complainant nor his counsel has put in appearance.  Let the case be taken up at 12.35 P.M.

                                                                             Sd/-                                      Sd/-

                                                                        Member                                 President

                                                                                                                        30.09.2015

Present:          None for complainant.

                        Sh. Keshav Sharma, Adv. for OP No.1.

                        Sh. Rajiv Sachdeva, Adv. for OP No.2.

 

                        Case taken up at 12.35 P.M and called repeatedly but none has put in appearance on behalf of complainant.  In the interest of justice, the case be again taken up at 2.30 P.M.

                                                                             Sd/-                                         Sd/-

                                                                        Member                                 President

                                                                                                                        30.09.2015

 

Present:          None for complainant.

                        Sh. Keshav Sharma, Adv. for OP No.1.

                        Sh. Rajiv Sachdeva, Adv. for OP No.2.

 

                        Case taken up at 2.30 P.M. and called repeatedly but this time also neither complainant nor his counsel has put in appearance.  Perusal of file reveals that  the case is fixed for evidence of complainant subject to cost of Rs.200/- to be deposited in consumer legal aid account alongwith last opportunity but today neither any evidence has been tendered nor cost deposited rather none has put in appearance for complainant.  Further perusal of file reveals that the case is being adjourned repeatedly for evidence of complainant since 21.11.2012 but the complainant has failed to conclude his evidence in-spite of having last opportunity alongwith cost.  As such, it is presumed that the complainant is not interested in pursuing the present complaint.  Hence, the present complaint is dismissed in default for non-appearance of the complainant. Copies of this order be sent to parties concerned free of costs, as per rules.  File after due compliance be consigned to record room.  

 

Announced: 30.09.2015                                                 Sd/-                                          Sd/-

                                                                                    Member                                 President

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.