View 32914 Cases Against Life Insurance
View 32914 Cases Against Life Insurance
Adari Lakshmi filed a consumer case on 20 Feb 2015 against Aegon Religare Life Insurance Company in the Visakhapatnam-II Consumer Court. The case no is CC/38/2014 and the judgment uploaded on 12 Mar 2015.
Reg. of the Complaint:03-02-2014
Date of Order:20-02-2015
FORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMERS FORUM-II
AT VISAKHAPATNAM
Present:
1.Sri H.ANANDHA RAO, M.A., L.L.B.,
President
2.Sri C.V.RAO, M.A., B.L.,
Male Member
3.Smt.K.SAROJA, M.A., B.L.,
Lady Member
FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015
CONSUMER CASE NO.38/2014
BETWEEN:
SMT.ADARI LAKSHMI D/O LATE GOVIND, HINDU,
AGED 30 YEARS, R/AT D.NO.18-5-15/2, VILLURI AKKAYYA STREET,
GAVARAPALEM, ANAKAPALLI, VISAKHAPATNAM-531 002.
…COMPLAINANT
AND:
1.AEGON RELIGARE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
2ND FLOOR, PARANJPE “B” SCHEME,
SUBASH ROAD, NEAR GARWARE HOUSE,
VILE PARLE (EAST), MUMBAI-400 057.
2.AEGON RELIGARE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, OPP:SAMPATH
VINAYAKA TEMPLE, ASILMETTA, VISAKHAPATNAM.
…OPPOSITE PARTIES
This case coming on 19-02-2015 for final hearing before us in the presence of SRI AKKIREDDY SATYA RAO, Advocate for the Complainant, and of SRI P.KUMAR, Advocate for the 1st Opposite Party, and of 2nd Opposite Party, being set exparte, and having stood over till this date for consideration, this Forum made the following.
ORDER
(As per SMT.K.SAROJA, Honourable Lady Member on behalf of the Bench)
c) For costs of the complaint; and
d) For such other relief or reliefs as the Honourable Forum deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
2. The 2nd Opposite Party did not appear before this Forum, hence, it was set exparte and remained exparte. Though the 1st OP appeared before this Forum and filed Vakalat, but they did not file any counter and other documents to support their contention.
4. At the time of enquiry, the complainant filed Evidence Affidavit as well as written arguments to support her contention. Exhibits A1 to A8 are marked for the complainant, Exhibit A9 is suomoto marked. No documents are marked for the OP. Heard the complainant.
Exhibit A1 is the Insurance Policy, Exhibit A2 is the Proposal Form dated 09-05-2011, Exhibit A3 is the Claimant’s Statement dated 19-03-2012, Exhibit A4 is the Death Claim Intimation, dated 19-03-2012, Exhibit A5 is the Acknoweldgement No.ARL678166-P9QYD3 dated 19-03-2012, Exhibit A6 is the representation letter sent by the complainant to the OPs, dated 31-07-2012, Exhibit A7 is the acknowledgement, dated 08-08-2012, Exhibit A8 is the letter of complainant of death claim dated 23-03-2012, Exhibit A9 is the Death Certificate of the father of the complainant dated 29-12-2014.
5. The fact shown from Exhibits A1 and A2 reveal that the OPs issued policy in favour of complainant’s father and also received an amount of Rs.20,000/- towards first premium of the Policy, Exhibits A3 and A4 reveal that the complainant sent the claim form along with necessary documents to the OPs for settlement of her claim. Exhibit A9 reveals that the complainant’s father i.e., Beda Appa Rao died on 19-11-2011 and so that a certificate was issued by Registrar of Births and Deaths, Anakapalle Municipality.
6. The point that would arise for determination is:
Whether there is any deficiency of service on the part of the OPs? If so, Whether the Complainant is entitled to the reliefs asked for?
7. After careful perusal of the case record, this forum finds that there is no dispute regarding the issuance of the Insurance Policy in favour of the complainant’s father/deceased. The OP sent a cheque dated 23-03-2012 towards the payment of the fund value of the policy of Rs.13,435.29ps vide LR.No.036706 dated 21-03-2012 drawn on HDFC Bank to the complainant. After receiving the cheque, the complainant wrote a letter to the OP and requested them to settle her claim. After receiving the letter, they kept silent, it amounts to deficiency of service on the part of the OPs. The OPs failed to file counter and any other documents to show that the complainant’s claim is not maintainable, they kept silent after filing Vakalat. Hence, the complainant is entitled to Rs.3,86,564.71ps. as the complainant received an amount of Rs.13,435.29ps. So, it is to be deducted in the insurance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- (i.e., Rs.4,00,000/- minus Rs.13,435.29ps = Rs.3,86,564.71ps). Hence, the complainant is entitled to insurance amount with interest, some compensation and costs too.
8. In the result, this complainant is allowed directing the Opposite Parties to pay an amount of Rs.3,86,564.71ps. (Rupees Three lakhs, eighty six thousand, five hundred and sixty four and seventy one paise only) with 9% p.a., from 23-03-2012 till the date of actual realization, to pay a compensation of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) and costs of Rs.5,000/-(Rupees Five Thousand only) to the complainant. Time for compliance one month from the date of this order.
Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by us in the open Forum, on this the 20th day of February, 2015.
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-M.MEMBER PRESIDENT L.MEMBER
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
Exhibits Marked for the Complainant:
Exhibits | Date | Description | Remarks |
A-1 |
| Insurance Policy Schedule | Photostat copy |
A-2 | 09-05-2011 | Proposal Form | Photostat Copy |
A-3 | 19-03-2012 | Complainant’s Statement | Photostat copy |
A-4 | 19-03-2012 | Death Claim Intimation | Photostat copy |
A-5 | 19-03-2012 | Acknowledgement No.ARL678166-P9QYD3 | Photostat copy |
A-6 | 31-07-2012 | Representation letter sent by the complainant to the OPs | Photostat copy |
A-7 | 08-08-2012 | Acknowledgement | Original |
A-8 | 23-03-2012 | Letter of complainant of death claim along with postal receipt | Original |
A-9 | 29-12-2014 | Death Certificate | Original |
EXHIBITS MARKED ON BEHALF OF THE OPS: -NIL-
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-
M.MEMBER PRESIDENT L.MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.