Haryana

StateCommission

CM/16/2016

Ishita Bhalla - Complainant(s)

Versus

Advance India Project Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

05 Oct 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA.

 

                                      Application No.                      16 of 2016

                                      In Complaint No.                             141 of 2015

                                      Date of the Institution:                    29.3.2016

                                      Date of Decision:                   05.10.2016

 

 

1.      Ishita Bhalla w/o Shri Tamish Kathpalia, r/o A-103, Antriksh Apartments, Plot No.26, Sector-4, Dwarka, New Delhi-11075.

 

2.      Tamish Kathpalia s/o Shri devinder Kumar Kathpalia, r/o A-103, Antriksh Apartments, Plot No.26, Sector-4, Dwarka, New Delhi-11075.

                                      …..Applicants/Complainants

Versus

 

1.      Advance India Project Ltd. (AIPL), Registered Office: 232 B, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase III, New Delhi-110020.

2^nd Address:-

Advance India Project Ltd. (AIPL), Sales & Marketing Office, The Masterpiece, Golf Course Road, Sector 54, Gurgaon-122002.

 

2.      Haamid Real Estates Private Limited (HREPL), Registered Office: 232 B, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase III, New Delhi-110020.

 

3.      Valion Realty through its Proprietor Mr. Amit K. Lalit, 4^th Floor, Plot No.127, Sector 44, Gurgaon, Haryana.

                                      …..Opposite Parties

 

 

 

CORAM:    Mr. Nawab Singh, President.

Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.

                    Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.

 

Present:-    Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate for the complainants.

                   Mr. Tarun Gupta, Advocate for the opposite parties No.1 and 2.

                   (Service of opposite party No.3 dispensed with vide order dated 15.01.2016).

                            

                                                O R D E R

 

 

B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member

 

          This order shall dispose of an application filed by the applicants/complainants for issuance of directions to the opposite parties to produce booking application dated 31.05.2012.

2.      Opposite parties in their reply have stated that no such booking application dated 24.07.2012 was ever filled up.

3.      Though, in the heading of the application, complainants have mentioned application dated 31.05.2012, while in the body of the application as well as in the prayer, complainants have sought production of application dated 24.07.2012. Since, no such application was ever submitted and opposite parties have denied the submission of application dated 24.07.2012, therefore, no directions can be issued to the opposite parties to produce a document which does not exist. It may also be added that the opposite parties have placed on the file booking application dated 03.06.2013 and have exhibited in their evidence.

4.      In view of above, the application is dismissed.                 

 

October 05th  2016

Diwan Singh Chauhan Member

B.M.Bedi Judicial Member

Nawab Singh President

D.R.