West Bengal

StateCommission

CC/09/31

Shyamal Kr. Mazumder. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Aditya Narayan Singh. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Sankar Mukhopadhyay.Mr. Prolay Roy.

03 Nov 2009

ORDER


STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION , WEST BENGALBHAWANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor), 31 Belvedere Road. Kolkata -700027
CONSUMER CASE NO. 09 of 31
1. Shyamal Kr. Mazumder.S/o Manindra Kr. Mazumder. 8/7, sahidnagar. PS. Kasba Kolkata-700078.West Bengal2. De-Novo Construction (P) Ltd. 8, Lyons Range, Kolkata- 700001.West Bengal ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Aditya Narayan Singh.S/O Late Jagadish Narayan Singh. 8/2, Palm Avenue, PS. Kareya, Kolkata- 19.West Bengal2. Prabhat Kr. Singh. S/O Late Jagadish Narayan Singh. 8/2, Palm Avenue, PS. Kareya, Kolkata- 19.West Bengal3. Maya Singh, W/O Sitaram Singh Yadav. 8/2, Plam Avenue, PS. Kareya, Kolkata- 19.West Bengal4. Dipak Singh. S/O Late Late Sitaram Singh Yadav. 8/2, Plam Avenue, PS. Kareya, Kolkata- 19.West Bengal5. Purnima Nag (Nee Singh) D/O Late S.R. Singh. 8/2, Palm Avenue, PS. Kareya, Kolkata- 19.West Bengal ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Mr. Sankar Mukhopadhyay.Mr. Prolay Roy., Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 03 Nov 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

No. 10/03.11.2009.

Complainant is present through Ld. Advocate Mr. P. Roy.  Heard the Ld. Advocate for the Complainant.  No one appears for the O.P. nor any objection has been filed.  It appears that the statements have been made that certain facts crept in original complaint which are required to be corrected and from the convenience of preparing proper pleading a liberty may be granted to file afresh after withdrawing the present complaint.  Therefore, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn and we make it clear that the Complainant will be entitled to file afresh on the same cause of action in accordance with law.


MRS. SILPI MAJUMDER, MemberHON'BLE JUSTICE ALOKE CHAKRABARTI, PRESIDENT ,