Sanil kumar P S filed a consumer case on 24 Jun 2022 against Add me cart in the Thiruvananthapuram Consumer Court. The case no is CC/192/2021 and the judgment uploaded on 30 Jun 2022.
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PRESENT
SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN : PRESIDENT
SMT.PREETHA G NAIR : MEMBER
SRI.VIJU.V.R : MEMBER
CC.NO.192/2021 (Filed on : 24.06.2021)
ORDER DATED : 24.06.2022
COMPLAINANT
Sanilkumar.P.S
Kannannur Palackal House,
Kudappanakkunnu.P.O
Thiruvananthapuram – 695505
(Party in person)
VS
OPPOSITE PARTY
Add Me Cart, Jai Stambh Chowk,
Opposite Gurh Gali, Rajgarh,
Rajgarh.M.P, India, Pin – 465661
(Exparte)
ORDER
SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN : PRESIDENT
1. This complaint is filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.
2. This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party. The case of the complainant is that on 29.04.2021 the complainant placed order for an Apple Laptop worth Rs.53,991/-. The said amount was paid from the account of one of the relative of the complainant namely Sobha through net banking. As the laptop was not delivered within the stipulated time, the complainant contacted the opposite party through whatsup and then the opposite party informed that the Apple laptop for which the complainant placed order is not available and the opposite party offered to deliver Refurbished Laptop worth Rs.45,000/-. The opposite party also promised to refund the remaining amount. As the complainant was not willing to purchase Refurbished Laptop offered by the opposite party, the complainant cancelled the order on 28.05.2021 through the opposite party’s website and a message was also forwarded to the opposite party. Till the date of filing this complaint, the opposite party has not made any rearrangements for the refund of the amount received from the complainant. Hence alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of opposite party, the complainant approached this Commission for redressing his grievances.
3. After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite party. Though the opposite party accepted the notice, the opposite party failed to appear before this Commission and hence on 16.12.2021 this Commission declared the opposite party as exparte.
4. The evidence in this case consists of PW1 and Exts.P1 to P6 were marked on the side of the complainant. The opposite party being declared exparte, there is no oral or documentary evidence from the side of the opposite party.
Points to be considered:
1) Whether there is any deficiency in service on the part of the
Opposite Party as alleged by the complainant?
2) Whether the complainant is entitle for the relief claimed in the
complaint?
3) Order as to cost?
5. Heard. Perused records. To substantiate the allegations raised in the complaint, the complainant himself sworn an affidavit as PW1 and Exts.P1 to P6 documents produced and marked. Ext.P1 is the copy of mail for booking the laptop. Ext.P2 is the copy of statement of account from Federal Bank. Ext.P3 is the copy of mail from opposite party. Ext.P4 is the copy of e-mail showing cancellation of order by complainant. Ext.P5 is the copy of offering refund. Ext.P6 is the copy of refund & return details. From Ext.P2, it is evident that an amount of Rs.53,991/- is seen transferred from the account of Sobha.V. Ext.P3 communication proves the placement of order by the complainant by paying Rs.53,991/- and further case of the complainant is that the opposite party is ready to deliver Refurbished Laptop for a price of Rs.45,000/-. Ext.P5 reveals that the opposite party has agreed to pay back the remaining amount if the complainant is ready to take delivery of Refurbished Laptop worth Rs.45,000/-. As there is no contra evidence from the side of the opposite party we are accepting the evidence adduced by the complainant. By swearing an affidavit as PW1 and by marking Exts.P1 to P6, we find that the complainant has succeeded in establishing his case. In the above circumstances we find that this is a fit case to be allowed in favour of the complainant in the absence of any contra evidence from the side of the opposite party.
In the result, the complaint is allowed. The opposite party is directed to refund Rs.53,991/- with 6% interest from 29.04.2021 along with Rs.15,000/- as compensation and Rs.2500/- being the cost of this proceedings within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order, failing which the amount except cost carries interest @9% per annum from the date of order till realization.
A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.
Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 24th day of June 2022.
Sd/-
P.V.JAYARAJAN : PRESIDENT
Sd/-
PREETHA G NAIR : MEMBER
Sd/-
VIJU.V.R : MEMBER
be/
APPENDIX
CC.NO.192/2021
List of witness for the complainant
PW1 - Sanil kumar.P.S
Exhibits for the complainant
Ext.P1 - Copy of mail for booking the laptop
Ext.P2 - Copy of statement of account from Federal Bank.
Ext.P3 - Copy of mail from opposite party.
Ext.P4 - Copy of e-mail showing cancellation of order by complainant.
Ext.P5 - Copy of offering refund.
Ext.P6 - copy of refund & return details.
List of witness for the opposite party - NIL
Exhibits for the opposite party - NIL
Court Exhibits - NIL
Sd/-
PRESIDENT
BEFORE THE DISTRICT
CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION
VAZHUTHACADU
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
CC.NO.192/2021
ORDER DATED : 24.06.2022
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.