Maharashtra

Pune

CC/14/530

Priyanka Shripad Supnekar, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ackruti Jay Developers, - Opp.Party(s)

Smt. J.Kulkarni

05 Nov 2016

ORDER

PUNE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM
PUNE
Shri V. P. Utpat, PRESIDENT
Shri Onkar G. Patil, MEMBER
Smt. K. B. Kulkarni, MEMBER
 
Complaint Case No. CC/14/529
 
1. Rahul Ashok Sangpal,
R/ at S.No.31, H. No.772, Mungale Anna Nagar Dhanakawadi, Pune 43
2. Mrs. Sujata R. Sangpal,
R/ at S.No.31, H. No.772, Mungale Anna Nagar Dhanakawadi, Pune 43
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Ackruti Jay Developers,
Office at A1 Success Chambers, 1232 Apte Rd., Deccan Gymkhana, Pune 411 004.
............Opp.Party(s)
Complaint Case No. CC/14/530
 
1. Priyanka Shripad Supnekar,
R/ at 190/ 5, Shreeprasad Hsg. Soc. Ganjive Chowk, Navi Peth, Pune 30
2. Shripad V. Supnekar
R/ at 190/ 5, Shreeprasad Hsg. Soc. Ganjive Chowk, Navi Peth, Pune 30
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Ackruti Jay Developers,
Office at A1 Success Chambers, 1232 Apte Rd., Deccan Gymkhana, Pune 411 004.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V. P. UTPAT PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Onkar G. Patil MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MRS. Kshitija Kulkarni MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
Adv. Smt. Jayshree Sandeep Kulkarni
 
For the Opp. Party:
Adv. Smt. Sukruta A. Chimalker
 
Dated : 05 Nov 2016
Final Order / Judgement

COMMON ORDER IN CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.CC/14/529 + CONSUMER COMLAINT NO.CC/14/530

Per – Hon’ble Mr. V. P. Utpat, President

          In both these consumer complaints, we have heard learned Adv. Smt. Jayshree Sandeep Kulkarni on behalf of the Complainants and learned Adv. Smt. Sukruta A. Chimalker on behalf of the Opposite Party at length.  With their help, we have also carefully scrutinized the entire material placed on record.

[2]     In reply to query by this Forum, during the course of her oral submissions learned counsel for the Complainants fairly submitted that both these consumer complaints are beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Forum and prayed that both these consumer complaints may be returned for presenting these consumer complaints for presenting before appropriate Forum/Commission having competent jurisdiction to entertain, try and decide these consumer complaints.

[3]     Thus, in view of pecuniary jurisdiction of this Forum, as culled out under the provisions of Section-11(1) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and in view of submissions made at the Bar by the learned counsel for the Complainants, Consumer Complaint No.529 of 2014 as well as Consumer Complaint No.530 of 2014 are hereby returned to the Complainants for presenting these complaints before the appropriate competent Forum/Commission, within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of this order.  Upon retaining one complete set of compilation of consumer complaints, remaining sets shall be returned to the Complainants for presentation of the same before competent Forum/Commission in pursuance of foregoing order.  Both these consumer complaints accordingly stands disposed of.  No order as to costs.  Original copy of foregoing order shall be retained together with record & proceeding in Consumer Complaint No.529 of 2014 and certified copy thereof shall be tagged together with record & proceeding in Consumer Complaint No.530 of 2014.

Pronounced on 05th November, 2016

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V. P. UTPAT]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Onkar G. Patil]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MRS. Kshitija Kulkarni]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.