Kerala

Palakkad

CC/61/2022

Suresh kumar.P - Complainant(s)

Versus

Acer India Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

K.R. Santhoshkumar

21 Dec 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PALAKKAD
Near District Panchayath Office, Palakkad - 678 001, Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/61/2022
( Date of Filing : 08 Apr 2022 )
 
1. Suresh kumar.P
S/o Narayanan Nair, Palakizhi House, Kallippadam Post, Shornur-2 Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad Dist.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Acer India Private Limited
Embassy heights 6th floor, No.13,Magrath Road, Banglore Rep. by its Manager
2. The Manager
Wafa Roshini Building 2(Wh), Plot No.12/P2(IT Sector) Hitech, Defence and Aerospace Park,Devanahalli,Bengaluru,Karnataka. (Currently running its Office Wafa Roshini (Pixelpalette), No.514, 4th cros
3. P.C. Clinic
A.K.M.Complex, Opposite Casino Hotel(P) Ltd., T.B.Road,Thrissur.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Vidya A MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Krishnankutty. N.K MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 21 Dec 2022
Final Order / Judgement

 DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PALAKKAD

Dated this the  21st  day of December, 2022

 

Present      :   Sri.Vinay Menon V.,  President

                  :  Smt.Vidya A., Member             

                  :  Sri.Krishnankutty N.K., Member                                 Date of Filing: 08/04/2022    

 

     CC/61/2022

Sureshkumar P.,

S/o.Narayanan Nair,

Palakizhi House,

Kallipadam Post,

Shornur,  Palakkad.                                                     -           Complainant

(By Adv. K.R.Santhoshkumar)  

 

                                                                                    Vs

1.    Acer India Pvt.Ltd.

   6th Floor,  Embassy Heights,

   No.13, Magrath Road, Bangalore

   Rep.by its Manager

 

2.    The Manager,

   Wafa Roshini,

   Building 2 (WH), Plot No.12/P2 (IT Sector),

   HiTech Defence & Aero Space Park,

   Devanahalli, Bangalore – Karnataka

 

3.    P.C.Clinic,

   AKM Complex, Opp.Casino Hotel,

  TB Road, Thrissur

  Rep.by its Manager                                                  -           Opposite parties   

              (OP1 by Adv.Muhammed Sufail T)

               (OP2 & 3 set exparte)

 

O R D E R

 

By Sri. Vinay Menon V., President

 

  1. Gist of pleadings are that the complaint purchased a gaming monitor manufactured by the 1st opposite party, which developed some problems with regard to its clarity, which the complainant alleges, is attributable to manufacturing defect.
  2. The 1st opposite party filed version preferring a settlement proposal expressing their readiness and willingness to replace the existing standalone monitor of complainant with an ‘Acer’ brand new standalone monitor of reasonable configuration as full and final settlement of this complaint.
  3. Complainant has filed a statement dated 02/12/2022 accepting the said proposal made by the 1st opposite party. 
  4. Resultantly, this complaint is disposed off with the direction that the 1st opposite party shall handover an ‘Acer’ brand new standalone monitor of reasonable configuration as full and final settlement of this complaint. Upon receipt of the same, the complainant shall return the existing standalone monitor to the representative or agent of the 1st opposite party.

                        Pronounced in open court on this the 21st   day of  December, 2022.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

                                                                                                          Sd/-                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Vinay Menon V

                                                      President

                                                             Sd/-

   Vidya.A

                       Member        

         Sd/-                                                                   Krishnankutty N.K.

                                                                                                      Member

 

NB : Parties are directed to take back all extra set of  documents submitted in the proceedings in accordance with Regulation 20(5) of the Consumer Protection (Consumer Commission Procedure) Regulations, 2020 failing which they will be weeded out.

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Vidya A]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Krishnankutty. N.K]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.