West Bengal

StateCommission

AEA/38/2022

The General Manager, Telecom BSNL, Calcutta SSA - Complainant(s)

Versus

Abul Kalam - Opp.Party(s)

Ms. Namrata Das(Sen), Mr. Arman Das

15 May 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
Appeal Execution Application No. AEA/38/2022
( Date of Filing : 08 Sep 2022 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/08/2022 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/24/2020 of District Hooghly)
 
1. The General Manager, Telecom BSNL, Calcutta SSA
CTO Building (3rd Floor), 8, Red Cross Place, Kolkata- 700 001.
2. The Junior Telecom Officer, Dhaniakhali Telephone Exchange
P.O. & P.S.- Dhaniakhali, Dist- Hoogly, Pin- 712 303.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Abul Kalam
S/o, Lt Abu Jafar. Vill- Manikpur, P.O.- Belmuri, P.S.- Dhaniakhali, Dist- Hoogly, Pin- 712 302.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. AJEYA MATILAL PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. SOMA BHATTACHARJEE MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Ms. Namrata Das(Sen), Mr. Arman Das, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 
Dated : 15 May 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Hon’ble Mr. Ajeya Matilal, Presiding Member

          This appeal has been preferred against the order no. 14 dt. 05.08.2022 passed in EA/24/2020. In the impugned order, it is observed by the Ld. Forum below that the judgment of CC/183/2013 was passed on  04.03.2020 and in spite of getting sufficient opportunity, the J.dr side has neither filed any appeal before the Hon’ble State Commission nor has brought any stay order of the Hon’ble State Commission.

          Moreover, the order of issuing W.A has been passed by this District Commission on 31.05.2022 and no review application has been filed within one month for reviewing the stay order no. 10 dt. 31.05.2022 in compliance of Section 40 of the C.P. Act, 2019.

          According to the Ld. Commission below, there was no scope for recalling the W.A. So, prayer for recalling the W.A was rejected on contest.

          At this stage, Ld. Advocate for the J.dr submitted that subsequent to that fact the J.dr preferred an appeal being no. A/31/2023 against final order of CC/183/2013 dt. 04.03.2020 and the J.dr concerned is Government employee. So, the prayer for recalling W.A should have been considered by the Forum below. But the aforesaid appeal is yet to be admitted as the petition for condonation of delay is still pending.

          So, in view of above observation, we are of the view, that the present execution appeal should not be entertained.

          Accordingly, AEA/38/2022 is dismissed on contest. Impugned order is upheld. There shall be no order as to the costs. Order of stay, if there is any stands vacated.

          Let a copy of this order be sent to the Ld. DCDRC, Hooghly, Chinsurah.

          The Joint Registrar of this Commission is requested to do the needful in this regard.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. AJEYA MATILAL]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SOMA BHATTACHARJEE]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.