Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/390/2018

S.Balasubramanian - Complainant(s)

Versus

ABRA Motor Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

V.Mani

06 Jan 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI (NORTH)

@ 2ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.

 

PRESENT : THIRU G. VINOBHA, M.A., B.L.,                          : PRESIDENT

                                  TMT. KAVITHA KANNAN, M.E.                          : MEMBER-I

                                  THIRU V. RAMAMURTHY, B.A., B.L., PGDLA : MEMBER-II

                      

FRIDAY THE 06th  DAY OF JANUARY 2023

C.C.NO.390/2018

 

S.Balasubramanian,

S/o.Late Sri.T.V.Sivaranakrishnan,

T-2, 3rd Floor, Priyadarshini Apartments,

162/14, Murugu Nagar, 5th Street,

Velachery,

Chennai-600 042

                                                                                                …..Complainant

 ..Vs..

1. Abra Motors Private Limited,

Rep.by its Authorised Signatory,

No.41, First Main Road,

C.I.T.Nagar,

Chennai-600 035.

 

2. Susee Automobiles Private Limited,

Rep.by its Authorised Signatory,

No.9, Dindigul Main Road,

Karumandapam,

Trichy-620 001.

 

3. Volks Wagen Groups Sales India Private Limited,

Rep by its Authorized Signatory,

3, North Avenue, Level 4,

Maker Maxity, Bandra Kurla Complex,

Bandra (E), Mumbai-400 051.                                      ….Opposite parties.

Counsel for Complainant                              : M/s. V.Mani.

Counsel for 1st Opposite party                        : M/s.Nandini Ram

Counsel for 2nd Opposite party                        : M/s.Y.Prakash

Counsel for 3rd Opposite party                        : M/s.A.R.Ramanathan

ORDER

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. G.VINOBHA, M.A.,B.L.,

          This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.

          The complainant filed this complaint against the opposite parties to replace the vehicle Volkswagen Polo (Highline 1.2L) bearing Registration No. TN 07 BH 6229 or directing the opposite parties to pay a sum of Rs.7 lakhs regarding the value of the cost of the vehicle and to pay Rs.3 lakhs for mental agony and loss for deficiency in service and in all a sum of Rs.10 lakhs in view of the restoring back by way of replacement of the new vehicle with good condition.

Complainant absent.  No representation for complainant.  Sufficient time granted.   Complainant has no interest in prosecuting the matter.  Hence, the complaint is dismissed for default.

Order Pronounced dated 06th  January  2023.

 

MEMBER – I                         MEMBER – II                                          PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.