BEFORE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD
F.A.No.299 OF 2011 AGAINST C.C.NO.24 OF 2011 DISTRICT FORUM-II VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT
Between:
Andhra Bank Rep. by its Chief Manager
I Town Vijayawada
Correct Address:
Andhra Bank, rep. by its Chief Manager
Vijayawada Main Branch, Andhra Bank
Building, Ground Floor, R.R.Apparao Street
Vijayawada-001
Abotula Durgamba W/o China Satyanarayana
Housewife r/o D.No.8-1-8, Ramgopal Choultry
Respondent/complainant
Counsel for the Appellant
Counsel for the Respondent
QUORUM:
SRI THOTA ASHOK KUMAR, HON’BLE MEMBER
MONDAY THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Hon’ble Member)
1.
2. `50,000/- with the appellant-bank under Abhaya Gold Savings Bank Account bearing number 0602010000 on 6.12.2008 for the maturity value of Rs.60,168/-and after expiry of the maturity date, she requested the appellant-bank and on its failure to pay the amount, she got issued notice on 29.11.2010.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
7. :`50,000/- made by the respondent with the appellant bank on 6.12.2008 is not disputed and the amount promised to be paid on maturity to the respondent is also not disputed. The learned counsel for the appellant-bank has contended that notice was not served on the appellant-bank. As contended by him there are two branches, Kothapet branch and Bazar branch other than the appellant-bank.
8.
“The Supreme Court, further dealing the concept of Article 226(2) and relying on the decision of ONGC (1994 AIR SCW 3287), explained the concept of cause of action in para 17 at page 130 of the report and the relevant extracts wherefrom are excerpted below :
“It is clear from the above judgment that each and every fact pleaded by the respondents in
10.
11.
KMK*
