Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/25/2018

Prasanthi.G - Complainant(s)

Versus

ABC India International Partnership Firm, - Opp.Party(s)

J.Nandagopal

21 Oct 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/25/2018
( Date of Filing : 13 Feb 2018 )
 
1. Prasanthi.G
Maduravayal, Chennai95
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ABC India International Partnership Firm,
Kilpauk Chennai-10
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 21 Oct 2021
Final Order / Judgement

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                   BEFORE   HON’BLE THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                    ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                       Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                  ::      MEMBER

 

CC. No. 25/2018

                                                         DATED THIS THE 21st DAY OF OCTOBER 2021

 

1.Mrs.Prasanthi.G,

W/o Mr.Gowri Shankar P.

2. Mr.Gowri Shankar.P,

S/o M.Prem Kumar.K,

No.24, Pallavan Nagar Extn,

First street, Maduravoyal,

Chennai 600 095                                                                       ..Complainants

                                              Vs

1.M/s ABC (India) International

Partnership Firm, Rep.by its Agent

Real Value Promoters Private Limited

Its Authorised Signatory Mr.M.Manohar,

Having its registered office at

No.37, Harleys Road,

Kilpark, Chennai 600 010

 

2. Real Value Promoters Private Limited

Rep.by its Authrized Signatory Mr.M.Manohar,

Having registered office at No.17/1,

Poes Road, 2nd street,

Teynampet, Chennai 600 018                                                          ..opposite parties

 

Counsel for the complainants          :  M/s J.Nandagopal

Opposite parties 1 and 2                :  Set exparte

 

This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :

                                                                          

                                                 Docket order

 

              No representation for Complainant. Today this matter is posted for appearance of complainant and for arguments (list). When this matter was called at 10.30 am, there was no representation for complainant, hence the matter was passed over and again called at 12.30 noon, the complainant was again not present. Since the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the complaint is dismissed for default. No cost.

            Sd/-                                                                                                             Sd/-

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                         R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                              PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.