BALJEET SINGH filed a consumer case on 20 Feb 2017 against AARYAMAN AUTOMOBILES in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is RP/12/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 03 Mar 2017.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA
Revision Petition No: 12 of 2017
Date of Institution: 06.02.2017
Date of Decision : 20.02.2017
Baljeet Singh s/o Sh. Chand Ram, Resident of Mandi Road, Israna, Tehsil Israna, District Panipat.
Petitioner-Complainant
Versus
1. Aaryaman Automobiles through its Branch Manager, Plot No.64, Sector-25, HUDA, Phase-1, Industrial Area, Panipat.
2. Aaryaman Automobiles, G.T. Road, Karnal through its G.M. Head Office 117/6, KM Milestone, G.T. Road, Karnal.
3. General Motors India (P) Limited, through its Managing Director/Marketing Division Manager, A-16, MIDC, Talegaon, Industrial Area, Phase-II, near Floriculture Park, Telegaon, Navlakh, Umbhre Village Road, Tehsil Maval, Pune-410507.
Respondents-Opposite Parties
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.
Shri Balbir Singh, Judicial Member.
Argued by: Sh. Pardeep Solath, Advocate for petitioner.
Sh. A.K. Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2.
O R D E R
NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL)
This complainant’s revision petition is directed against the order dated January 17th, 2017 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panipat (for short ‘the District Forum’), whereby it directed Aaryaman Automobiles-Opposite Parties No.1 and 2 to hand over possession of the vehicle bearing registration No.HR-06 AF-8048 to the complainant on making payment of Rs.1,08,481/- by the complainant.
2. Baljeet Singh-complainant/petitioner purchased a car (Chevrolet Beat), bearing Registration No.HR-06 AF-8048 on February 20th, 2015 from Aaryaman Automobiles-opposite parties No.1 and 2, that is, the authorised dealers of General Motors India Private Limited-Opposite Party No.3 (manufacturer). The car was insured with The New India Assurance Company Limited (for short ‘the Insurance Company’) vide policy Annexure P-6. The complainant noticed some defects in the car. The car was taken to Aaryaman Automobiles-opposite party No.1 and the same was repaired on October 14th, 2016. After repairing the car, the opposite No.1 raised bill of Rs.1,08,481/-. The complainant did not pay the bill amount on the ground that the car was having manufacturing defects. So, the opposite party No.1 did not deliver the car to the complainant. Hence complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was filed before the District Forum seeking direction to the opposite parties to hand over possession of the car to him after receiving the amount of Rs.10,000/- only.
3. During the hearing, it has been agreed between the parties that the complainant shall pay 50% of the bill amount of Rs.1,08,481, that is, Rs.54,240/- and for the remaining amount, he would furnish adequate security to the satisfaction of the District Forum. After paying 50% of the bill amount and furnishing the security, Aaryaman Automobiles-opposite parties No.1 and 2 shall release the car to the complainant subject to the decision of the complaint. It is ordered accordingly.
4. The District Forum is directed to decide the complaint within three months from the date of receipt of this order.
5. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Announced: 20.02.2017 |
| (Balbir Singh) Judicial Member | (Nawab Singh) President |
CL
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.