ORAL ORDER

Per – Hon’ble Mr. V. P. Utpat, President

          None present for Complainant even on second call.  Complainant failed to appear before this Forum without any sufficient reason.  Perusal of order-sheet reveals that so was the position even on previous two adjourned dates viz. 03/03/2017 and 31/12/2016.  Thus, in these peculiar circumstances, it does appear to this Forum that Complainant has lost his interest in further prosecution of present consumer complaint.  Consequently, consumer complaint stands dismissed for want of prosecution in accordance with provisions of Section-13(2)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Rule-4(7) of Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000.  Parties shall bear their own costs.

Pronounced on 05^th June, 2017