Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/80/2018

Amman Industry Rep by its Karunanidhi - Complainant(s)

Versus

A1 Paper Cups Rep by its Manager - Opp.Party(s)

P.Rathnavel

30 Mar 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.80/2018

 

(Against the Order dt.29.12.2017 made in C.C. No.238/2012 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (North))

DATED THE 30^TH DAY OF MARCH 2023

 

M/s. Amman Industry,

Represented by its Proprietor,

Mr. K. Karunanidhi,

No.1, Main Road,

Vikravandi & Post,

Villupuram District – 605 652.                                             .. Appellant / Complainant.  

 

-Versus-

A1 Paper Cups,

Represented by its Manager,

No.38, Easwar Kailash,

Balavinayagar Nagar,

Arumbakkam,

Chennai – 600 106.                                                      .. Respondent / Opposite party.

 

Counsel for Appellant / Complainant            : M/s. P. Rathanavel

Counsel for Respondent / Opposite party    : M/s. A. Arumugam

                

This appeal coming up before us on 30.03.2023 for appearance of the appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:        

                                                                                                                                                                               

Docket Order

 

Respondent present and ready for arguments. No representation for the appellant.  

This appeal is posted today for appearance of the appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this appeal is dismissed for default.    No order as to costs.

 

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                       

             MEMBER                                                                                     PRESIDENT