Telangana

StateCommission

CC/11/2011

D.Madhavi, D/o.V.Vidyadhar Rao, - Complainant(s)

Versus

A.Venkateswara Reddy, Representative of M/s.Srija Constructions, M/s.Srija Constructions, R/o.H.No.1 - Opp.Party(s)

09 Jun 2011

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/11/2011
 
1. D.Madhavi, D/o.V.Vidyadhar Rao,
R/o.Flat No.405, Sai Nivas Residency, Srungeri Colony Road, # 1, Kothapet, Hyderbad
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. A.Venkateswara Reddy, Representative of M/s.Srija Constructions, M/s.Srija Constructions, R/o.H.No.17-1-391/T/154,
Saraswathi Nagar, Saidabad, Hyderabad
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA Member
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION:HYDERABAD

 

C.C.11 of 2011

 

Between:

 

D.Madhavi, D/o.V.Vidyadhar Rao,

Aged about 35 years, Occupation :House wife,

Resident of Flat No.405,Sai Nivas Residency,

Srungeri Colony 

Hyderabad                                           

        

A.Venkateswara Reddy ,

(Representative of M/s. Srija Constructions,

Firm bearing No.2657 of 2006 )

Aged about 43 years, Occupation:Business,

M/s. Srija Constructions,

R/o.H.No.17-1-391/T/154,

Saraswathi Nagar, Saidabad,

Hyderabad 

 

Counsel for the complainant        

 

Counsel for the opposite party     

QUORUM:    

                                                              

               THURSDAY THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE,

                       

 

Oral Order ( 

 

***

 

 The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant purchased      registered sale deed in her favour for flat no.405 th

 

       

 

       

 

The brief point   

It is the complainant’s case that she paid an amount of Rs.8,50,000/- by cash on 3.4.09 and entered into an agreement of sale evidenced under Ex.A1 for flat no.405 admeasuring 1045 sq.ft. for a total sale consideration Rs.25,59,000/- .  th               

 

In the result this complaint is allowed in part                                                                                                               

 

 

Sd./PRESIDENT

 

 

 

                                                                                                           

Sd./MEMBER

                                               Pm*    

 

                                                           

 

                                               

                                               Witnesses examined

 

For the complainant 

 

Evidence affidavit of the complainant

 filed in lieu of Chief Examination

 as PW1. 

Exhibits marked on behalf 

Ex.A1: Copy of Agreement of Sale   Ex.A2: 

Ex.A3 : Payment Ex.A4 : 

Ex.A5 

Ex.A6 

            

Ex.A7 

Ex.A8   

Ex.A11 :  

       Ex.A12 

 

Exhibits marked on behalf of the opposite party:Nil 

 

 

                                                                         

 

                                                                       

 

                                                                       Pm*                                                                 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
Member
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.