A.R.C. Equipments Pvt. Ltd., V/S Sri.Madan Kumar N. - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Mandya

CC/09/78

Sri.Madan Kumar N. - Complainant(s)

Versus

A.R.C. Equipments Pvt. Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Sri.M.E.Madhusudhan

22 Oct 2009

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANDYA
D.C.Office Compound, Opp. District Court Premises, Mandya - 571 401.
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/78

Sri.Madan Kumar N.						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
A.R.C. Equipments Pvt. Ltd., ARC Equipments Pvt., Limited						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

1. Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma2. Sri.M.N.Manohara3. Sri.Siddegowda

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

1. Sri.Madan Kumar N.

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

1. Sri R.Nataraju

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Complainant is present. Joint compromise memo filed Complainant consent for the compromise. In view of the compromise memo the complaint is dismissed as not pressed.

Complainant is present. Joint compromise memo filed Complainant consent for the compromise. In view of the compromise memo the complaint is dismissed as not pressed.

......................Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma
......................Sri.M.N.Manohara
......................Sri.Siddegowda