KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM APPEAL 346/09 JUDGMENT DATED: 17.5.2010 PRESENT JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU : PRESIDENT SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA : MEMBER 1.The Manager, : APPELLANTS Koyenco Autos Pvt. Ltd., Koyenco House, West Hill, Calicut. 2. The Manager, Koyenco Autos Pvt. Ltd., Kannur Branch, Abana Complex, Pallukunnu, Kannuar. (By Adv.S.Reghukumar) Vs. A.K.Abdulrahiman Haji, : RESPONDENT S/o Kunhimahinkutty Haji, Residing at Malige Valappil House, P.O.Adhur, Mulleria, Kasaragod. (By Adv.R.S.Kalkura) JUDGMENT JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU : PRESIDENT The appellants are the opposite parties in CC.3/07 in the file of CDRF, Kasargod. 2. It is the case of the complainant is that he paid for a superior model Indica DLG car but was supplied with a low priced model ie. Indica DLS car. He has sought for the price difference ie, Rs.17000/-. 3. The case of the opposite parties is that although the complainant booked DLG model but at the time of purchase he opted DLS model and a sum of Rs. 3690/- the difference was offered to be paid. But the complainant refused to accept the same. 4. The evidence adduced consisted of the testimony of PW1 and DW1; Exts.A1 to A7 and B1 to B6. 5. The case of the opposite parties/appellants is that accessories worth Rs.14,000/- was also given. The complainant has denied the same. It is seen from the price list produced by the opposite parties that the price of the DLG model is Rs.3,71,347/- and that the DLS model car is Rs.3,53,610/. The discount offered is Rs.14000/- is not disputed. As per the copy of the DD produced the complainant has paid an amount of Rs.3,57,900/- with which if the discount amount of Rs.14000/- is added the amount would work out to Rs.3,71,347/-. We find that the above aspect clinches the issue. The opposite parties have offered Rs.3690/-. The price difference between the 2 models after discount would work out to Rs.17000/-. In the circumstances we find that there is no bonafides in the case set up by the appellant. We find there is no scope for the interference in the order of the Forum. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Office is directed to forward the LCR to the Forum along with the copy of this order. JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU : PRESIDENT SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA : MEMBER ps |