Chandigarh

StateCommission

RBT/FA/57/2011

The Managing Director - Complainant(s)

Versus

A.D. Sehgal - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Naresh Mehta, Adv.for the appellanats with Mr.Atma Singh,authorized representative of the appellants

19 Oct 2011

ORDER


The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. No. RBT/FA/57/2011
FIRST APPEAL NO. FA of 2011
In
O.A. NO.FA/26/2011
1. The Managing DirectorIndian Railway Welfare Organisation a soceity registered under the Societies, Registration Act XXI of 1869, Railway Complex, Shivaji Bridge, Behind Shankar Market, New Delhi 1100012. The Project ManagerIndian Railway Welfare Organisation, Rail Vihar, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula, Haryana ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. A.D. SehgalTrack Supply Officer (Retd.), Indian Railways, resident of 6/1C, Rail Vihar, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula, (No. 178/30.6.98)2. Jaswinder Sharma5/20, Rail Vihar, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula( No. 179/30.698)3. Daljeet Singh6/30, Rail Vihar, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula (No. 180/30.6.98)4. S.P. Maini10/1A, Rail Vihar, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula (No. 231/24.8.98)5. Surender SootiType I,Flat No. D,Block 13, 3rd Floor, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (399/13.12.99)6. Gurmeet SinghType II, Flat C, Block 13, 3rd Floor, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (400/13.12.99)7. S.L. DhirFlat No. 5/1B, Type 3A, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (401/13.12.99)8. V.P. Khuranaflat No. 7/D, Type IV, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (402/9.12.1999)9. Jugal Kishore SainiFlat No. 11/1B,Type No. 3, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (4.3/9.12.1999)10. Surinder Sainiflat No. B, Block 6, type 3A, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (404/9.12.99)11. Paramjit Sainiflat No. 2C, Block 15, type II, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (405/9.12.1999)12. K.K. Adlakhaattorney of Shri Rahinder Pal, flat No. 5/3B, type 3A, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (406/9.12.99)13. Ahsa Sharma10/1-C, Rail Vihar, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula(407/9.12.99)14. Sh. S.K. Tyagi11/3A, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (408/9.12.99)15. Jai Bhagwan Sharmaflat 9/3C, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (409/99)16. Arun Kumar Kaushalflat No. 11/3B, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (410/9.12.99)17. Gurdev Singh khairaflat no. 7/A, Type IV, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (411/9.12.99)18. Ashwani Kumarflat no. 14/3D, type 2, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (412/9.12.99)19. Suman Manju Guptaflat no. 11/3D, type 3 Rail Vihar, Panchkula (413/9.12.99)20. N.K. Handaflat No. 5/3C, type 3A, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (414/9.12.99)21. Brahm Swarup Thakurflat no. 7/2B, type 3A, Rail Vihar, MDC, Sector 4, Panchkula (65/10.3.2000)22. Sh. Meenakhshi Kanwarwife of J.S. Kanwar, 1012/2, Sector 45B, Chandigarh (66/10.3.2000)23. Satish Sharmatype II, Flat No. B, Block 15, 3rd Floor, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (85/17.4.2000)24. Surender Sharmatype II, Flat no. B,Block 14, 1st Floor, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (86/17.4.2000)25. Amrik Singhtype IV, flat no. A, Block 6, 1st Floor, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (87/17.4.2000)26. Naresh Kumartype I, Flat No. A, Block 26, 2nd Floor, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (88/17.4.2000)27. Kirpal Kaurflat No. C, type 3A, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (138/2.5.2000)28. Hardev Singh flat No. 5/1A, Type 4, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (139/2.6.2000)29. Joginder Singhflat No. 6/1D, Rail Vihar, Panchkula (151/8.6.2000), Haryana ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Sh. Naresh Mehta, Adv.for the appellanats with Mr.Atma Singh,authorized representative of the appellants, Advocate for
For the Respondent :ShYogesh Mittal, Adv. rsp.9,16,20 alongwith Sh.Jugal Kishore Saini, Sh.Arun Kumar Kaushal, Sh.N.K.Handa, resp.9,16,20.Sh.Suryakant , Advocate

Dated : 19 Oct 2011
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Respondent No.19 is proceeded against ex-parte.

                        Sh.Naresh Mehta, Advocate has appeared on behalf of the appellants and filed his power of attorney, which is taken on record.

                        Sh.Suryakant Gautam, Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent No.11 and filed his power of attorney, which is taken on record.

                        Sh.Yogesh Mittal, Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent No.9, 16 and 20 and filed his power of attorney, which is taken on record.

                        Counsel for respondents No.9, 16 and 20 has submitted that they have entered into a compromise with the appellants and the copy of the compromise is Annexure A-1. The joint statement of respondent Nos. 9,16 and 20, duly identified by their Counsel in regard to the compromise has been recorded.

                        Counsel for the appellant has heard the statement made by the counsel for the respondents No.9,16 & 20 and admits the same to be correct. The statement of Mr.Atma Singh aforesaid  authorized representative of the appellants, and identified by his Counsel has also been recorded.  The Counsel for the appellants submits that in view of the compromise (Annexure A-1), he withdraws the appeal, against all the respondents.

                        In this view of the matter, the appeal, is dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.

                        Certified copy of this order, be communicated to the parties, free of charge.        


HON'BLE MRS. NEENA SANDHU, MEMBERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER, PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, MEMBER