Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/45/2021

S. Palanisamy S/o Senniyappa, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District. - Complainant(s)

Versus

A. Venkatesh Kumar, Gopalapuram, Coimbatore Dist. - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

28 Jun 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                             MEMBER

 

F.A. No.45/2021

 

(Against the Order dt.20.08.2019 made in C.C. No.164/2016 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Coimbatore)

DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF JUNE 2023

 

S. Palanisamy,

S/o. Mr. Senniyappa Gounder,

No.1/400, Subbegounden Pudur,

Anamalai Main Road,

Pollachi Taluk,

Coimbatore District.                                                        .. Appellant / Complainant.  

 

-Versus-

A. Venkatesh Kumar,

India Towers 2^nd Floor,

Room No.2, 2^nd Street, Gopalapuram,

Coimbatore – 641 018.                                              .. Respondent / Opposite party.

 

Appellant / Complainant                              : Party in person

Counsel for Respondent  / Opposite party  : M/s. L. Mouli

 

                       This appeal coming up before us on 28.06.2023 for appearance of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:  

                                                                                             

Docket Order

 

           Respondent present and ready for arguments. No representation for appellant in person.  

This appeal is posted today for appearance of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant/ party in person was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant/ party in person.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this appeal is dismissed for default.    No costs.

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                       

             MEMBER                                                                                     PRESIDENT