Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/258/2019

N.Girija, W/o R.Nethaji, No.500, 25th street, KK.Nagar, Chennai 600 078. - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.The Sales Manager, Chennai Ford, No.4233, Poonamalli High Road, Arumbakkam, Chennai 600 106. GIVEN - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.C.H.Vinoba Gandhi

03 Jan 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

                               BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                                                        Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.258/2019

As against the order in C.C. No.191 of 2014, on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission)

                                                                   DATED THE 3rd  DAY OF JANUARY 2022

 

N. Girija,

W/o. Mr. R. Nethaji,

No.500, 25^th Street,

K.K. Nagar,

Chennai – 600 078.                                                    

  Petitioner / Appellant / Complainant.

 

-Vs-

 

1. The Sales Manager,

  Chennai Ford,

  No.4233, Poonamalli High Road,

  Arumbakkam,

  Chennai-600 106. 

 

2. The Manager,

    Axis Bnk Loan Center,

    No:6A, Cetennian Square, 2^nd Floor,

    Dr. Ambedkar Road, Kodambakkam,

    Chennai – 600 024.

 

3. President and Head (Law)

   Axis Bank Central Office,

   Maker Tower,

   1^st Floor, Cuffe Parade,

   Kolaba,

   Mumbai – 400 005.

                                                                                     Respondents  / Opposite Parties.

 

Counsel for the Appellant / Respondent       : M/s. C.H. Vinoba Gandhi

Given up – R1, R2 & R3                                    M/s. Sai Krishnan

 

This appeal coming up before us on 03.01.2022 for appearance of appellant R2 and R3 and For arguments (in list) or For dismissal                                                          

Docket order

 

            No representation for appellant Respondents Present.. This appeal is posted today for   appearance of appellant and Respondents 2 and 3 and for arguments in list or for dismissal.   When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M., the appellant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

               

                   Sd/-                                                                                                        Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                            R.SUBBIAH                        

           MEMBER                                                                                                PRESIDENT