Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/76/2020

M.D.Hussani S/o Mr.S.L.Hussain, - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.The Manager, the Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. C.Sundramoorthy

27 Feb 2023

ORDER

                STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                     Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

FA.NO. 76/2020

(Against the order in CC.No.396/2014, dated 11.10.2018 on the file of

District Consumer Commission, Chennai(South)

 

                                                  DATED THIS THE 27^TH  DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023

 

M.D. HUSSANI,

S/o Mr.S.L.Hussain,

No. 7/269, Muthallamman Koil street,

Cantonment,

Pallavaram,

Chennai 600 043                                      ..Petitioner/Appellant

 

                                          Vs

1. The Manager,

The Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd,

Reliance House,

No.6, Haddows Road,

Nungambakkam, Chennai -6

 

2. The Manager,

Arihant Auto Finance,

New No.25, Veerappan street,

1^st Floor, Sowcarpet

Chennai 600 079

 

3. The Regional Transport Officer,

RTO (East Pulianthope),

Chennai 600 012                                         ..Respondents/Respondents

 

Counsel for Petitioner/Appellant              : M/sC.Sundaramoorthy

Counsel for 1^st Respondent/Respondent   : M/s Elveera Ravindran

2^nd Respondent                                     : Dismissed

3^rd Respondent                                     : Notice served

 

          This appeal is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :

 

                                             Docket order

No representation for Appellant. R1 present.  This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for arguments in list or for dismissal.  When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M,  the appellant was not present  hence,  passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared.   Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.  Hence the appeal is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

Sd/-                                                                                                         Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                 R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                                                                             PRESIDENT