Telangana

Mahbubnagar

CC/11/76

K. Venkataiah S/o K. Mogulappa, - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. The Manager, Shiram City Union Finance Ltd., H.No.1-5-35, 1st Floor, New Town, Mahabubnagar and a - Opp.Party(s)

Sri M. Chennaiah Goud

29 Aug 2011

ORDER

                                     BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM AT MAHABUBNAGAR

   Monday, the 29^th day of August, 2011

                                                             Present:- Sri P. Sridhara Rao, B.Sc., LL.B., President

                                                                             Sri A. Veerupakshi, B.A., LL.B., Member

    Smt. D. Nirmala, B.Com., LL.B., Member

C.C.No. 76 Of  2011

Between:

K. Venkataiah S/o K. Mogulappa, aged 40 years, Occ: Teacher, R/o Gokafaslawad village, Doulthabad Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.  

                                                                                                                                                                             … Complainant

And  

1. The Manager, Shiram City Union Finance Ltd., H.No.1-5-35, 1^st Floor, New Town, Mahabubnagar.
2. The Branch Manager, Shiram City Union Finance Ltd., H.No.4-8-75, Mallappa Complex, 1^st Floor, Narayanpet, Mahabubnagar District.

                                                                                                                                                                 …Opposite Parties

This is a complaint filed under section 12 of C.P. Act, 1986 praying to direct the opposite parties to receive the due amount of Rs.60,858/- and deduct extra amount of Rs.17,396/- from total amount of Rs.78,354/- and to pay compensation of Rs.15,000/- for mental agony and Rs.5,000/- towards costs of the complaint.

 This C.C. coming on before us this day in the presence of Sri M. Chennaiah Goud, Advocate, Mahabubnagar for the complainant and Sri K. Chandramouli, Advocate, Mahabubnagar for the opposite parties and having stoodover for consideration till this day, this Forum delivered the following:   

                                                                                                O R DE R

            Affidavit of complainant not filed. At this stage, the complainant filed a memo stating that the matter is settled out of court as such the complaint can be dismissed as not pressed.  The memo is accordingly recorded.  In view of the memo filed, the complaint is dismissed as not pressed.  No costs.     

Pronounced by us in the open Forum, on this the 29^th day of  August, 2011.

 

MEMBER                             MEMBER                                PRESIDENT