Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/332/2019

D.Jayabalachandran, S/o C.Dharuman, A1B1, GF, Arunachala Concepts, Thanigai Salai, Arulmurugan Nagar, Kilkattalai, Chennai 600 117. Ph:96771 62879 - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.The Executive Director, Air India Ltd., Airline House, Meenambakkam, Chennai 600 027. Kanchipuram - Opp.Party(s)

PARTY IN PERSON

07 Jun 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

               BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                 Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 FA. No. 332/2019

(Against the order in C.C. No.27/2017, dated 9.4.2019, on the file of

District Consumer Forum, Chengalpattu, Kanchipuram District)

 

                                                                 DATED THIS THE 7^TH  DAY OF JUNE 2022

 

D.Jayabalachandran,

S/o C.Dharuman,

A1B1, Ground Floor, Arunachala Concepts,

Thanigai salai,

Arulmurugan Nagar,

Kilkattalai, Chennai 600 117                             ..Complainant/party in person

 

                                                 Vs

1. R.Harihar,

Executive Director,

Air India Ltd, 

Airline House,

Meenambakkam,

Chennai – 600 027          

Kanchipuram District                           

 

2. M.V.Joshi,

General Manager (Finance), 

Air India Ltd, 

Airline House,

Meenambakkam,

Chennai – 600 027          

Kanchipuram District                                       ..Respondents 

 

For the complainant                                  : party in person

Counsel for the Respondents                     : M/s  N.G.R.Prasad

 

          This appeal is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court : -

                                                          

 

                                                      Docket order

          No representation for appellant/party in person. Counsel for the Respondent present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant in person and for filing written arguments of both and for arguments in list or for dismissal. Today when the matter was called at 11.00 A.M,   the appellant was not present, hence passed over and called again at 12.30 noon,  then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

Sd/-                                                                                                        Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                                                                            PRESIDENT