Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/159/2019

S.Ananda Natesan S/o N.Shanmuga Sundaram, W/o Saroja , No.661 ,Pillaiyar Koil Street, Keerapalayam Post , Chidambaram Taluk , Cuddalore Dist. - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.The Branch Manager , The Cuddalore District, Central Co-operative Bank Ltd , Bhuvanagiri Branch. A - Opp.Party(s)

P.Venugopal

27 Feb 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

              BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                   Thiru.R VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 FA. No. 159/2019

(Against the order in C.C. No.78/2010, dated 8.5.2019, on the file of

District Consumer Commission, Cuddalore)

 

                                                         DATED THIS THE 27^th   DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023

 

 S.Anandanatesan,

S/o N.Shanmugasundaram,

C/o Saroja,

No.661, Pillaiyar Koil street,

Keerapalayam post,

Chidambaram Taluk,

Cuddalore District                                                ..Appellant/complainant

 

                                              Vs

1.The Branch Manager,

The Cuddalore District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd,

Bhuvanagiri Branch

 

2.The Special Officer,

The Cuddalore District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd,

Cuddalore District

 

3. P.Hemalatha

W/o S.Anandanatesan,

D/o.G.Panneerselvam,

No.1/10B, Sowrashtra Street,

Keel Bhuvanagiri,

Chidambaram Taluk 608 601                           ..Respondents/opposite parties

 

Counsel for the Appellant/complainant                     : M/s P.Venugopal

Counsel for the Respondents/opposite parties 1 & 2   : M/s R.Arumugam

Counsel for the 3^rd Respondent/3^rd opposite party      : M/s M.Jayaseelan

 

      This appeal is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                                

                                                Docket order

      No representation for Appellant. R1 and R2 present.  This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for arguments in list or for dismissal.  When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M,  the appellant was not present  hence,  passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared.   Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.  Hence the appeal is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

         Sd/-                                                                                                         Sd/-

  R  VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                R. SUBBIAH

               MEMBER                                                                                  PRESIDENT