Orissa

Balangir

CC/23/2022

Parameshwar Panda,aged about 46 years, S/o- Banmali Panda - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.The Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda, Kantabanji,Branch , Kantabanji - Opp.Party(s)

16 Jun 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM. BOLANGIR
ODISHA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/23/2022
( Date of Filing : 26 Jul 2022 )
 
1. Parameshwar Panda,aged about 46 years, S/o- Banmali Panda
At/Po/Ps/-Bangomunda
Bolangir
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. 1.The Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda, Kantabanji,Branch , Kantabanji
At/Po/Ps- Kantabanji
Bolangir
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri Rabindra Kumar Tripathy PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt Jyotshna Rani Mishra MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 16 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

        Adv. For the Complainant: -    Self

        Adv. For O.Ps                      :-   Sri B.Patra, Sri R.K.Mohakur

        Date  of filing of the Case  :- 26.07.2022

        Date of Order :-    16.06.2023

  

 JUDGMENT

The fact of the case in  nutshell:-

                The complainant is an agricultural loanee of the Bank of Baroda Kantabanji  Branch , Bolangir. He had taken loan in the year 20/07/2018 and a sum of Rs.2000/- was deducted from his KCC loan amount vide account No.3540500000206 for PMFBY 2017/2018 who is OP No.1 in this case who insured the crop with Cholamandalam General Insurance Company. Pvt. Ltd. who is OP No.2. in this case.

 

             The Government of Odisha  declared drought in the said  year and a crop loss of 58%  was declare as such the village Laripadar also comes under the said loss of 58 % . The complainant did not received the claim of actual amount according to the declare percentage but received Rs.6,345/- instead of 80,000/- which is genuine and equal to the percentage of crop loss declare by the Government of Odisha.

                The complainant came to know while updating his passbook and enquire the matter to OP No.2 but got the replied to that effect that we have paid the total amount to the bank and the Bank has to distribute to the farmer according to the percentage of crop  loss.                                              

                                                            -2-

The complainant sought information in R.T.I. but the Bank did not provide the elaborate information to the complainant . The complainant came to know that in the same area the neighbour  tenant got Rs.56,000/- according to the percentage of crop loss where as by deducting the same  amount of premium from the complainant . The complainant received Rs.6,345/- which is totally wrong. The complainant enquire the matter to the B.M of the Bank but the Bank remain silent in this regard, Hen this case.

 

(2)          To substantiate his case the complainers relies on the following documents.

                (1)          `Xerox copy of the transaction pages of pass book given by the Bank of Baroda.

                (2)          Xerox copy of the information given by Bank of Baroda on R.T.I. application.

                (3)          Xerox copy of account ledger enquiry .

                (4)          One affidavit given by the adjacent  tenant  as evidence.

                (5)          Xerox copy of ROR and Aadhar Card.

 

(3)           Having gone through the complainant petition it’s accompanied documents and on hearing the complainant prima facie it seemed to be a genuine case hence admitted and notice to the Ops were served. Op. No.1 and 2 appear through their councel.

Sufficient opportunity has been given to the Ops for filing of written version but the OPS were failed to filed the same as such non  filing of the written version in time I.e. (statutory period )the OPS were set experte  on dt.18/01/2023 against the complainant.

 

                From the record  it is found that one affidavit evidence given by the adjacent tenant of the complainant in the same village namely Ranjeet  Pattnaik who is also a loanee of the same bank and a sum of Rs.2000/- deducted as insurance premium in PFMBY and got the insurance benefit of Rs.55,900/-

As such it is unfair and deceptive trade practice of OP No.1 and 2 where one insured got Rs.55,900/- and the other  the same village and G.P. got Rs.6.500/- by paying the same amount Rs.2000/- as premium having the cultivable  land in the same Mouza Tahasil G.P and Block. The OP No.1 and 2 cannot discriminate the complainant regarding payment of insurance benefit which is unreasonable amounts to deficiency in service. After going through the allegation and evidence on record this commission feels and observes that the complainant deserves the remedies on merit. Hence order.

 

                                                                              ORDER

                OP No.1 and 2 are severally responsible but it is directed that OP No.2 is liable to pay an amount of Rs.49,665 /- @ 9%  interest per annum from the date of disbursement of the insured amount till the date of order and Rs.15,000/- towards mental agony and Rs.3,000/- towards litigation expenses within one month from the date of order  failing which the entire amount should be payable by OP No.2@ 12% interest per annum from the filing of the case till realization .

 

                          No award as to cost.

PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COMMISSION TODAY I.E DATED  16th      DAY OF  June’2023.

                                                   Sd/-                                                                                            Sd/-

                                         (J.MISHRA)                                                                    (R.K.TRIPATHY)

                                         MEMBER.                                                                     PRESIDENT(I/C)

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri Rabindra Kumar Tripathy]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt Jyotshna Rani Mishra]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.