BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

F.A.NO.182 OF 2021

(against the orders in CC.No.323/2018 on the file of the District Commission- Ranga Reddy

Between:

1. Jitendra Jain,

    S/o. Mangal Chand Jain past resident

    E7/1, RCI Residential Colony,

    Research Centre Imarat,

RCI Road, Shamshabad Rangareddy District P.O., Vignyan Kancha-500069

    Present resident House No.Flat No.H28, 1302,

    AWHO, Sandeep Vihar,

    Whitefield – Hoskote Road,

    Kannamangala, Bengaluru,

    Karnataka – 560115.                             …Appellant/ Complainant

And

 1. Relience Jio Infocomm Ltd.,

     4^th floor, Lake shore towers,

     Rajbhavan Road, Somajiguda,

     Beside Yes Bank, Hyderabad : 500082,

     Emailjyoti.jain@ril.com

    Represented by its manager

2. Chief General Manager,

    Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,

    Bharat Sanchar Bhawan,

    Harish Chandra Mathur Lane, Janpath,

    New Delhi DI-100001

    Emailhcpant@BSNL.Co.In

    Represented by its manager.

3. UBER India Systems Private Limited,

    Regus Business Platinum Centre Pvt., Ltd.,

Level 13 Platinum Techno Park,

Plot No.17/18, Sec-30A,

Vashi Navi Mumbai, Thane MH 400705

    Represented by its manager.

4. Chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India

    Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan

    (next to Zakir Hussain College)

    Jawaharlal Nehru Marg (Old Minto Road)

    New Delhi: 110002.

    E-mail ID:ap@trai.gov.in

    Represented by its manager.       ....Respondents/Opposite parties

Counsel for the Appellant/ Complainant:Sri Jitendra Jain(PIP)

Counsel for the Respondents/Opposite Parties : M/s. M. Hari Babu

                                                                                                  – R1

Sri Sudhakar Rao Kulkarni – R4

QUORUM: SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND TWENTY ONE

*******

Oral Order:

1.    This is an appeal filed by the Appellants / Complainants under Section 41 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 praying this Commission to allow the appeal by setting aside the order of the District Forum, Ranga Reddy passed in C.C.No.323 of 2018 dated 08.02.2021.

2.       In this batch of appeals, the Appellant Sri Jitendra Jain is said to have died on 23.04.2021.  Thereafter, this Commission has suo moto issued notices to the other Appellants/legal representatives of the deceased Jain, who are parties in the connected appeals and the same has been served as per the track record obtained from the postal authorities.  In spite of that, there is no appearance for the LRs/other Appellants in the connected appeals.  The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents are all present.  Since the deceased Appellant died more than seven months back, the appeal is liable to be dismissed has having been abated.

3.       Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.