Kerala

Kannur

CC/09/213

Shameem.K.P.K.P.house, Nr.BSNL Exchange, P.O,Pappinisseri - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.Rajesh.K.,Super Agencies, Idea Cellular Ltd. Nr.Makani, S.Bazar, Kannur. - Opp.Party(s)

30 May 2011

ORDER


CDRF,KannurCDRF,Kannur
Complaint Case No. CC/09/213
1. Shameem.K.P.K.P.house, Nr.BSNL Exchange, P.O,PappinisseriShameem.K.P.K.P.house, Nr.BSNL Exchange, P.O,PappinisseriKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus.
1. 1.Rajesh.K.,Super Agencies, Idea Cellular Ltd. Nr.Makani, S.Bazar, Kannur.Rajesh.K.,Super Agencies, Idea Cellular Ltd. Nr.Makani, S.Bazar, Kannur.Kerala2. 2.District Offices, Idea Cellular Ltd., Nr.Indian Oil depot, KannurDistrict Offices, Idea Cellular Ltd., Nr.Indian Oil depot, KannurKannurKerala3. 3.Regioanl Office, Idea Cellular Ltd., 2nd floor, Merciestate, Kochi 15.Regioanl Office, Idea Cellular Ltd., 2nd floor, Merciestate, Kochi 15KannurKerala ...........Respondent(s)



BEFORE:
HONORABLE MR. GOPALAN.K ,PRESIDENTHONORABLE PREETHAKUMARI.K.P ,MemberHONORABLE JESSY.M.D ,Member
PRESENT :

Dated : 30 May 2011
JUDGEMENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Complainant and oppoiste party absent. Memo filed by complainant stating that opposite parties remitted the entire  amount so tht he is not pressing the complaint. Since the mtter not pressed the complaint stands dismissed.

 

Sd/- President         Sd/- Member              Sd/-Member

 

fowarded by order/

 

Senior Superintendent


[HONORABLE PREETHAKUMARI.K.P] Member[HONORABLE MR. GOPALAN.K] PRESIDENT[HONORABLE JESSY.M.D] Member