Heard the learned advocate for the complainant. Perused the complaint filed by the complainant. The complainant has preferred this case with the following prayers  “  It is therefore prayed that O.P. No.1 may be directed to do the form fill up the complainant immediately and that the O.P. No.2 may be directed to declare the result of the  complainant and that the O.P. No. 1 may b directed to pay compensation to the tune of Rs,1,00,000/- towards the loss of time , money and mental peace of the complainant , and any such other order which this forum deem fit and proper may also be awarded in favour of the complainant”.

It is noteworthy to mention her that there has been a drastic change in consumer law. Consumer law 2019 came in to operation over ride the provision  of 1986 law. Where education cases are not comes under or within the preview of consumer law as such the DCDRC lacking the jurisdiction for adjudicate  the matter, which clearly reflect in the case law in controller of examination Shri  Jagannath Sanskrit Viswavidyalaya - Vrs-  Umasankar Dev. 2016 (1) OLR (CSR) 32:- That the complainant is not a consumer.

In another decision of Hon’ble SCDRC the District Inspector of School  Kendrapara & Others 2020 (1) OLR 679.

Held the fact of the case cannot come under the definition of complaint District forum has no jurisdiction to entertain the application.

Accordingly the case of the complainant is dismissed as not admitted without cost.