Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/307/2019

Regional Deputy Registrar (Housing) office of the Regional Deputy Registrar, Daniel Thomas Nagar, Thanjavur. - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.P.Rajeshwari, W/o A.Palanivel, 75/2, North Kudiyaana Street, Keezha Thanjavur Village, Nagapatinam - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.D.Geetha

31 Jan 2023

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                        BEFORE   Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                            Thiru.R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                ::      MEMBER

 

FA. No. 307/2019

(Against the order in C.C. No.11/2018, dated 31.10.2018, on the file of

District Consumer Commission, Thiruvarur)

 

                                                        DATED THIS THE 31^ST   DAY OF JANUARY 2023

 

1.Regional Deputy Registrar (Housing)

Office of the Regional Deputy Registrar,

Daniel Thomas Nagar,

Thanjavur                                               ..Appellant/3^rd opposite party

 

                                Vs

1. P.Rajeswari,

W/o A.Palanivel,

75/2, North Kudiyaana street,

Keezha Thanjavur Village,                         

Nagapattinam District                              ..1^st Respdt/ complainant

 

2. The Managing Director/General Manager

TN Co-op Housing Federation,

Chennai 600 007

 

3.Mr.Arivalagan,

Tiruvarur, Nagapattinam District,

Regional Recovery Officer,

TN Co-Op Housing Federation,

Chennai 600 007

 

4. Registrar of Cooperatives/Superintending Officer (Housing),

Liquidation Officer,

Thanjavur Taluk,

Thanjavur District                                    ..Respondents/opposite parties 1,2 &4

 

Counsel for the Appellant/ 3^rd opposite party    : M/s D.Geetha

Counsel for the 1^st Respdt/ complainant           : M/s V.S.Gopu

 

          This appeal is coming up before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court : -

                                                  

                                               Docket order

 

          No representation for both. This appeal is posted today for appearance of both and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present, hence passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

Sd/-                                                                                                     Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                    R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                                                                  PRESIDENT